|
 |
Analysis Brief's
November 2007
Greetings!
Business Stratagem Support Group (BSSG)
This is our tenth edition of the Analysis Brief for 2007. This particular issue focuses on the value of countersurveillance and good security measures and how it can detect and deter terrorism or other crimes. We also focus on some under-reported and unique twists to the Industrial Espionage threat, which we now believe is the single most sigificant threat facing business anywhere. Finally, you will see how BSSG continues to try and let victims know that there are some new, unqiue solutions to copper and metal theft through our Comprehensive Asset Protection Program. BSSG is constantly looking for unique and new approaches to keep the foes of our clients off balance. We hope this edition will provide some education and awareness and will stimulate discussion of the security challenges we face in the 21st Century, within the United States, and around the globe....Flexible innovative solutions for fluid threats!
WWW.INTERNATIONALBSSG.COM
CAPP
Comprehensive Asset Protection Program
Copper/Metal Thefts Continue Unabated
From USA Today to dozens of local newspapers, story after story covers the fact that companies and people throughout the United States are being forced to deal with the issue of increased copper and metal theft.
The victims include: utility companies losing copper wire; construction companies losing wiring, pipes and appliances; homeowners, churches, schools and malls losing wiring and air conditioner coils; farmers losing pipes and parts for irrigation pumps; vehicle owners missing their catalytic converters. The list goes on and on.
Why the jump in copper and other metal thefts? Mainly because the price of copper and many other metals has sky-rocketed. For example, in 2001 the average price for a pound of copper was approximately 65 cents. By 2003 it was 85 cents. But in the autumn of 2007, the price is now averaging $3.80 a pound. Midyear the price flirted with the $4 a pound mark and some predict that threshold will be crossed early in 2008.
Several Florida utilities have revealed losses close in a million dollars. In Colorado, one utility has reported losses in excess of $500,000. Nevada Power said its losses had doubled thus far in 2007. Copper and metal thefts have increased the cost of a new home by more than $3000 per residence and this is in a shrinking housing market.
Worse yet, the value of the loss is only a small part of the story. In the Tampa Tribune, there was a story about a new church where the air conditioning coils had been cut out. The value of the copper taken was only about $500 but the repair costs will be close to $50,000. The New York Times reported that theft of irrigation pumps were costing farmers $3000 to $10,000 to repair and replace the thefts. In fact, the cost of repairs can outpace the actual value of the lost copper or metal by at least 10 times the value of the metal.
In this environment, what are companies and authorities doing?
States are trying more aggressive enforcement and are changing their salvage statutes to require more detailed identification requirements for those bringing salvaged copper and metals into the salvage yard. Some states, such as Oklahoma, have tried to stem copper thefts by elevating the crime from a misdemeanor to a felony. The problem, according to police, is enforcing the law. A basic element of every felony or misdemeanor theft crime is to establish that the items were stolen and who the rightful owner is and that is where these efforts are wanting.
Companies have been hiring guards, installing surveillance cameras. But, as one company spokesman said, "There is no way our resources can be completely secured."
All of these private security measures, efforts by states and local law enforcement agencies are worthwhile. But they have not dramatically stemmed the thefts. We believe it is because the thieves are able to remove the ability of law enforcement to prove they have stolen property. That is why BSSG has come up with a layered security program that solves the problem of identifying stolen property called the Comprehensive Asset Protection Program or CAPP. In addition to the measures already mentioned, CAPP uses a covert scent, trained K-9 units that can screen salvage yards, and covert microdots that will positively identify stolen wire, pipes and parts even when they are ground-up or burned.
If you are truly interested in seriously reducing copper and precious metal thefts - and theft or tools and other property as well - contact BSSG to learn more about our CAPP approach.
www.internationalbssg.com
Red Team Concept
"I have studied the enemy all my life. I have read the memoirs of his generals and his leaders. I have even read his philosophers and listened to his music. I have studied in detail the account of every damned one of his battles. I know exactly how he will react under any given set of circumstances. And he hasn't the slightest idea of what I'm going to do. So when the time comes, I'm going to whip the hell out of him."
General George S. Patton (1885 - 1945)
COUNTERSURVEILLANCE TEAMS DEPLOYED IN HIGH RISK AREAS
We have regularly advocated countersurveillance teams be deployed to add a layer of protection to your facilities or other assets. It doesn't matter if the threat is coming from criminal elements or terrorists, there is often a reasonable amount of pre-planning and surveillance that takes place before the attack. This phase of terrorist or criminal planning is the one of your best opportunities to detect surveillance and intelligence gathering and then make changes that can cause the source of the threat to call off their planned action, postpone it, or divert it.
Recently we talked with the international security director of a major hotel chain. He advised that, after suffering several terrorist attacks, part of the protective measures implemented for high risk hotels includes deployment of a well-trained countersurveillance team. Since adding countersurveillance to their security approach, there have been multiple situations where suspicious activities were spotted. The hotel security was then able to react and enhance security as a contingency planning step. No adverse actions have occurred at any of the chain's hotels since the countersuveillance efforts were integrated into the overall security measures.
That success speaks volumes about the potential value of a countersurveillance team that is integrated into a full range of other protective measures.
Another corporate security director reinforced the potential value of a good, aware workforce that reports suspicious activities. As is often the case, regretfully, the initial driving force for improved security awareness was because the previous security education and awareness program was not working as well as it should have.
His particular company was the chain where an al Qaeda affiliated operative "camped out" to surveil and case the Prudential Building in New York City for a possible terrorist attack. As security and law enforcement tried to determine more about the surveillance when they found the photographs and notes at an al Qaeda safehouse, some of the chain's employees were questioned about a Middle Eastern man who might have been sitting outside at one of their tables for a long period of time. Several employees advised they had, in fact, seen such an individual but they had guessed he was trying to sell drugs so they did not report their suspicions to anyone.
Corporate security is now working with all employees who are located at sites near a potential target. These employees are receiving enhanced security education and awareness training that includes what to look for and how to report potentially suspicious actions by customers. In essence, these employees have become a countersurveillance team, of sorts.
Finally, we also got yet another example of the fact that increased security measures can deter, or at least divert, an attack or adverse action. Intelligence and after-the-fact investigations have determined that a U.S. hotel chain was being scouted by al Qaeda in Amman, Jordan for a possible November, 2005 attack. Because that hotel chain had implemented high security measures, the investigation revealed there was information showing that the terrorists decided it would be too risky to attack that particular hotel and instead chose three other Amman hotels where security was termed "light." At least that was the label used by the New York Times at the time. They were the Grand Hyatt, the Radisson and Days Inn in Amman. Some 57 people were killed and nearly 300 wounded in nearly simultaneous suicide bomb attacks on those hotels on November 10, 2005.
It is now clear that visible high security measures caused the bombers to scrap plans to attack the hotel that had effective security measures in place. So much for the cynics who constantly rationalize their lack of security with the old cliché - "You can't stop a dedicated terrorist. If he wants you bad enough, he can get you."
Like many clichés, there is probably some truth to that one. But such an overly simplistic rationalization ignores the fact that most terrorist plans do not call for a commitment against a specific, single target. They look for a target where an attack that has the best chance for success. The truth is, whether you are a hotel in Amman, Jordan, the World Bank Headquarters in Washington, D.C., or a high risk target traveling in the Philippines, (and these are all examples where we have good inside information to document that terrorists called off their planned attack on these targets) if you have reasonably good security, terrorists have been known to take you off their target list because they do not believe they could successfully attack you with reasonable effort.
After all, isn't that your goal if you are in charge of security for an asset?
If you would like to learn more about countersurveillance teams and hardening yourself so you do not become a target of terrorists or criminals, contact BSSG.
More Information
Chemical Corner
Homeland Security Relaxes Chemical Security Rules
As was predicted in the last Analysis Brief, when the Department of Homeland Security released its final version of Appendix A of the Chemical Plant Security Rule, on November 2, 2007. The new Appendix realealed a number of changes that mean the rules requiring protection of dangerous chemicals were greatly relaxed from what was initially proposed earlier this year. Essentially, the Department of Homeland Security caved into political pressure.
In April of 2007, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said it was critically important to diminish the threat posed by large private stockpiles of dangerous chemicals. We agreed with him. So the Department proposed a list of 344 chemicals and specific quantity thresholds with reporting criteria. There were some 4000 comments on the proposed Appendix. Most were critical because they suddenly realized it involved themselves, not just someone else. Some of the large lobbying organizations kicked into high gear to try and lessen the "security burdens" on a number of industries. For example, the original propane threshold was 7500 pounds, which is nearly four tons. Chicken farmers, for example, protested because, as one farm lobby noted, they thought this was just going to apply to companies like Dow Chemical. When the rules came out, many found out they were going to have to consider security too. With the new, revised rules you must have 30 tons of propane before you even have to consider any security measures!
Other changes included increasing the amount of chlorine gas from 1875 pounds to 2500 pounds. That means that the popular one-ton shipping cylinder no longer requires security even though it has been used multiple times by terrorists in Iraq. Ammonium nitrate quantities went from 7500 pounds to 10,000 pounds even though this is a principal component of fertilizer-based bombs used in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and the 1995 Oklahoma City Federal Building bombing.
A year ago, Congress passed a law that gave the Homeland Security department the authority to regulate hazardous chemicals in the U.S. But, we can thank people like Republican Senator Charles Grassley for saying you don't have to be concerned about securing 29 tons of propane gas as well as quantities of a number of other chemicals. Grassley's rationale: "To require farmers and small businesses to comply with these strict requirements and burdensome costs seems ridiculously disproportionate to the likelihood of a terrorist attack on an individual farm."
Well, Senator, we're not too concerned about a terrorist attack on an individual farm either; however, tons of unsecured propane may not just stay "down on the farm." That's the problem with ignoring security for many tons of dangerous chemicals. These chemicals become a potentially transportable stockpile of death and destruction that could end up at a shopping center, sports arena or any number of other large gatherings of people. It is a bit like saying no one should be concerned about an individual rifle or handgun... it may only be one or two guns, but they should still be secured too just like the armory that includes several hundred or thousand weapons.
The final version of the Appendix contains approximately 300 chemicals of interest with corresponding Screening Threshold Quantities or STQ's. The security concerns for which chemicals are listed are grouped into three categories:
1. Release Category: The potential to create significant adverse consequences if intentionally released or detonated
2. (Please note this one Senator Grassley and Secretary Chertoff) Theft/Diversion Category: The potential to be used as or converted into weapons if stolen or diverted
3. Sabotage/Contamination Category: The potential to create significant adverse consequences if mixed with other readily available materials
Even watered down, this is a step in the right direction and an improvement over no controls. Fortunately some responsible Congressmen and Senators have already announced they will re-examine the law and Homeland Security's rules. They have already said they will probably try and tighten the thresholds during 2008. We think it is worthwhile to be more specific since the Department of Homeland Security has not shown itself able to withstand much in the way of political pressure and that means our ports are still not very secure, our borders are still porous and air freight is still not fully screened.
Meanwhile, any facilities that possess any of the chemicals listed in Appendix A, at or above the STQ for the applicable security issues, have 60 days to complete and submit a Top-Screen form to the Department of Homeland Security.
If any companies, regardless of the official STQ, recognize that it is important to secure potentially dangerous chemicals, BSSG has expertise on how to reasonably and efficiently secure chemicals based on a risk-based approach.
More Information
Incident Management Team Room
4 POINT STANCE EXERCISE IN COLORADO
On October 27, 2007, three months of intensive planning and preparation culminated in Boulder, Colorado with the "4 Point Stance Exercise". In all, more than 200 individuals, ffrom over 20 agencies, participated in this multi-layered, mass casualty simulation event. This included five hospitals , the Boulder Emergency Operations Center, and the University of Colorado Emergency Management Operations Group, which served as the Incident Command Post, during an incident that simulated a collapse at the Balch Field House.
In addition to the mass casualties exercise component, with varying kinds of injury, the Tier One and EM systems computer program was used to track the patients. Pridemark Ambulance Service was able to enter 125 patients into the computer from the Incident Command Post in just over an hour, as they were transmitted to the hospitals.
The Boulder County Amateur Radio group (BCARES) sat up and ran live pictures to both Incident Command Post and the Emergency Operations Center. In all, 11 Exercise Evaluation Guides from the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program were used to cover numerous target capabilities. The area Boy Scouts were also involved and served as "victims." They were able to earn credits towards various merit badges by participating.
Of course it would not have been an exercise without an interoperability test. All of the hospitals were able to communicate on 800 MGHZ with the Emergency Operations Center and the Incident Command Post, in part due to an outstanding Incident Command System 205 Communications Plan put together by the Boulder County Sheriffs office communications team. The Salvation Army provided food services for all participants at the various exercise sites and, at the after action meeting, which was held at the Boulder Public Safety Building.
During the three month preparation period for the exercise, the online Homeland Security Evaluation and Exercise Program toolkit was used to create the exercise. The toolkit is so new that half way through the planning process, the computer program was still being adjusted by DHS. This caused some data to be lost and it had to be re-entered but the exercise went on as scheduled. On the exercise day, a good old fashioned Incident Command System 201 (in incident organizer format) was prepared and was used by the exercise team to run the exercise.
That exercise team included staff from the Colorado Biological, Nuclear, Incendiary and Explosives (B.N.I.C.E.) training center at Denver Health, Boulder County Public Health, Controllers from Pridemark Ambulance and evaluators from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, the Jefferson County Department of Public Health, Longmont Fire, Denver Public Health and the Colorado Division of Emergency Management.
Click here to take a look at the Incident Command System 201 (in incident organizer format) created for the exercise.
http://toddmanns.home.att.net/4_point_stance_Incident_Organizer_1.pdf
The World of Industrial Espionage
We have regularly noted the Industrial Espionage links to the People's Republic of China but, if there is any doubt about the prevalence of Industrial Espionage in the business world, here are two "new" players:
Venezuela Gets Industrial Espionage Training from Cuba and China
Venezuela, because of President Hugo Chavez, has emerged as a nation that officially opposes the United States and much of the Western world. Chavez has built friendships with Fidel Castro and his brother, Raul, and with the People's Republic of China. China, of course, is interested in Venezuela's oil.
Now we have received reports that Venezuela is increasingly developing its Industrial Espionage capabilities, especially within country. No surprise after Spanish security agencies reported that Venezuelan security placed a hidden microphone under a table where Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero was talking with his staff prior to a meeting with some opposition leaders in Venezuela.
Now, a former Cuban intelligence officer, who himself was trained by the East German counterintelligence service, known as the "Stasi," has revealed the Cubans are passing on what they know to Venezuela. Venezuelan intelligence services are learning, from the Cuban Ministry of Interior, known as MININT, how to bug tourist hotel rooms, use drugs, install covert microphones, two-way mirrors and install covert cameras.
Additionally, oil-industry sources advise that members of Venezuela's state oil company (PDVSA) recently traveled to Beijing to learn Industrial Espionage techniques, including how to eavesdrop on internet traffic, which has become a Chinese specialty above and beyond the bugging of offices/hotel rooms, use of covert cameras, microphones and two-way mirrors.
Travelers to Venezuela should be aware that this training, and past actions, demonstrates that the Industrial Espionage threat within Venezuela is high.
Zimbabwe Opens Industrial Espionage Academy
Zimbabwe's President, Robert Mugabe, has just reportedly launched an intelligence academy that will be named after him. Mugabe, who has ruled Zimbabwe since its independence from the UK in 1980, noted that Industrial Espionage was a needed skill in business and said this school was designed to provide those skills to African businesses.
The academy, which is called the Mugabe National School of Intelligence, is located at the Chitamba Farne in Mazowe Valley. During the ceremony to lay the cornerstone of the new academy, Mugabe said creating this school was in keeping with international best business practices (his words, not ours).
Mugabe said, "For instance, Japan and Switzerland have industrial espionage schools to train businessmen in the art of economic intelligence gathering... We should view the economic world differently, seeing the economy as immersed in politics and economic security as being indistinguishable from national security."
Mugabe is opening the academy to business people throughout Southern Africa. Businesses there should be aware that the Industrial Espionage threat is increasing.
____________________________
After examing the costs of Industrial Espionage to the United States (estimates go as high as $700 billion a year), to Germany (as high as $55 billion Euros a year), to the United Kingdom (as high as $50 billion a year) it is becoming evident that Industrial Espionage is the most serious threat to businesses. In spite of the tremendous consequences, it is astounding how little attention this threat is getting in the media and among businesses.
If you want to understand the Industrial Espionage threat and enhance your ability to protect your business from this threat, contact BSSG. We have a comprehensive countermeasures program that is patterned after the most successful program in the government but is tailored to the business world.
More Information
International Waters
Explosion in Glorietta 2 Mall in Makati City, (Metro Manila) Philippines
On October 19, 2007, a large explosion rocked the Glorietta 2 Mall in Makati City, Metro Manila. Ultimately, 12 people were killed as a result of the blast and up to several hundred were injured.
The Philippine National Police (PNP) initially said the blast was caused by a propane tank but investigators, seeing the broken concrete and twisted steel, changed their minds and warned the explosion appeared to be caused by a bomb. Investigators also noted that there were traces of a substance known as RDX (or cyclotremethylenetrinitramine) found at the explosion site. RDX is a chemical associated with plastic explosives. This caused concerns because the biggest source of plastic explosives in the Philippines is the Armed Forces of the Philippines.
Early on, alleged members of the Raja Soliman Movement (RSM) contacted the news media to take credit for the bombing. The RSG is a radical Islamic fundamentalist terrorist group that is largely made-up of converts to Islam.
Within a few days, PNP officials announced that preliminary investigation now seemed to indicate that the explosion was a result of an "industrial accident" and not a bombing. They noted that the RDX present was only in small amounts and that the chemical was also present in a number of other products, such as aerosols, deodorants, etc. Some of these items were stored in the basement. They concluded the most likely explosion cause was a build-up of methane gas that, in turn, caused diesel tanks in the basement to explode. According to the PNP, experts from the US Federal Bureau of Investigations and Australian police agreed with the PNP conclusion.
Meanwhile, experts from the engineering college at the University of the Philippines and some outside experts hired by the property owners, Ayala Land, both disputed the preliminary PNP conclusions, stating there was no chance a build-up of methane gas caused the explosions and there was little chance that the diesel fuel in the tanks played any role in the explosion unless there was some sabotage and alteration of the diesel fuel. They, along with some left wing opposition lawmakers, still believed it was a bomb but the latter group suspected the Arroyo administration of planting the bomb to take the focus off of scandals that were prompting an impeachment move. Of course, Ayala could be liable if it were an accident so it was only natural that they would not want the blast labeled an industrial accident.
What about the RSM claims? It seems that the messages to the media came from text messages and news media staff attempted to trace the number involved and found it traced back to the offices of some of the opposition law makers.
As a result of the confusing controversy, the Makati Business Club, an influential business group, and the Makati City Mayor, Jejomar Binay called for creation of an independent panel to investigate the explosion. Their theory was that a neutral, outside investigation would be free of the biases that would lead to one conclusion over another. Binay even recommended the chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce head the neutral, independent probe. The PNP, accused by some opposition lawmakers of staging a cover-up to protect the administration of President Gloria Arroyo, reacted to the proposed independent investigation by warning they would arrest anyone who tried to interfere in their investigation and would charge them with obstruction of justice.
As a result, as of this writing, the situation remains muddled and no one knows for certain what caused the mall explosion. The only sensible approach is to consider the possibility that the worst case scenario is valid and the mall was bombed by terrorists. With the Christmas holiday shopping period coming up, that means it would be wise to avoid the malls and public places... but then that might be wise regardless of the conclusion of this single investigation.
BSSG has offices in the Philippines that monitor the threats there and have the ability to provide security and investigative support. If you have personnel in the Philippines or personnel traveling to the Philippines, contact us about the security related risks and countermeasures. Even in the United States, the threats of terrorist bombings or other criminal activities in shopping malls and similar venues, warrants increased attention. BSSG has experience in risk assessments for businesses including malls. Contact us if you are interested in better protection options.
October 2007
Greetings!
Business Stratagem Support Group (BSSG)
This is our ninth edition of the Analysis Brief for 2007. As a follow-on to last month's 9/11 anniversary focus on terrorism, this edition will devote several more articles to examining terrorism. We will look at the potential for terrorism in the upcoming Olympics, in the Philippines and in the United States. Additionally, we will look at some diverse security issues ranging from theft to Industrial Espionage, from incident management and planning to Red Team issues. All of these diverse threats and solutions are inner-twined in our standard risk assessment approach that examines the threats (know your foe), your own capabilities (know your vulnerabilities) which allows you to take appropriate countermeasures to lessen the vulnerabilities to the threats you face. BSSG is constantly looking for unique and new approaches to keep the foes of our clients off balance. We hope this edition will provide some education and awareness and will stimulate discussion of the security challenges we face in the 21st Century, within the United States, and around the globe....Flexible innovative solutions for fluid threats!
WWW.INTERNATIONALBSSG.COM
This Months Featured Article
TERRORISM AT THE 2008 OLYMPICS?
Many companies will have personnel traveling to People's Republic of China (PRC) this coming year as China hosts the 2008 Olympics in Beijing from August 8-28, 2008. We were all reminded of that when, on the anniversary of 9/11, ZHOU Yong Kang, the Public Security Minister for the PRC, advised that the "biggest threat" to the Olympics would be "terrorism, separatism and extremism."
It drove home the point that we should now be looking at the terrorist threat to the 2008 Olympics. The following questions are relevant: How serious is the terrorist threat, how does this terrorism threat manifest itself within the PRC and what is being done to mitigate the risks in Beijing?
When talking about a threat to any Olympics, of course, one must look back to a radical Islamic terrorist group known as Black September and the 1972 Munich Olympics. Much as elsewhere around the world, the biggest terrorist threat within the PRC stems from extremist Islamic separatists. That is clear from the Public Security Minister's comments. The PRC has between 50-100 million Muslim citizens living within its borders. The majority of those are in two northwestern provinces, the largest of which is Xinjiang Province. While the number of extremists is estimated at less than one percent of the total Islamic population, that still means there is a large number of radicals who could be potential terrorists. In fact, some of these individuals are unquestionably terrorists. They are trained in conducting terrorist acts and have already resorted to terrorism inside China.
One of the problems with looking at any threat within the PRC is that censorship there means that it is difficult for an outsider to measure that threat. The PRC does not like to report on terrorism and tends to cover up what they consider to be adverse publicity. Nonetheless, we have some information that helps to quantify the threat.
It is clear that Beijing is concerned about that threat. There are the remarks of the head of the Public Security Bureau. Another indication of their concern is to look at how much effort and money is being expended on anti terrorism related measures. Once again, the PRC does not tend to share this information openly but the latest reports indicate that the PRC security apparatus is spending an estimated US$6.5 billion on physical security within the capital city because of the Olympics. That would be four times as much as the Greeks spent on the 2004 Olympic venue in Athens, the first Olympics after 9/11.
According to experts, China is spending half of those funds on securing the actual Olympic facilities - gymnasiums, field areas, training facilities, hotels/athlete housing and media centers. The Chinese will reportedly use the latest technologies such as biometric readers - using fingerprint and iris scanning - for access to sensitive areas. Additionally, the Chinese are spending a large amount of the security related funds on Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) surveillance including cameras that will be watching all venues real time on monitors that will be located in command centers. The monitoring of CCTV is essential to offer any preventive benefits. Part of the money will also be spent on security within the Beijing metropolitan area. In fact, reports indicate there will ultimately be as many as a million CCTV cameras monitoring virtually every public area and many of those systems will use special computer programs that employ visual recognition software and intelligent analytical programs to help the authorities quickly spot potential problems.
Detecting a potential problem is important but there must be a response capability. The Chinese have been working on this too. They now have quick-response anti-terror troops in every provincial capital city and have been conducting large-scale anti-terrorism exercises. They have dispatched police and military to New York City and London to learn lessons from terrorist attacks and have established a crisis control and management system that is similar to the US Homeland Security Incident Command System. Beijing has also joined the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombing and Suppression of Financing Terrorists. The Chinese say they want to share intelligence on the terrorist threats and to back this up they have agreed, after dragging their feet for years, to officially allow the stationing of a Legal Attaché from the US Federal Bureau of Investigations in Beijing. The main reason they allowed the FBI in Beijing is because they want to focus on anti-terrorism cooperation.
Terrorist Threat in the PRC
The PRC has good reason to be concerned. There are a number of radical Islamic extremist groups that qualify as terrorist affiliated groups that have a history of operating in China. This includes the Eastern Turkistan Liberation Organization (ETLO), the Eastern Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM) of Uzbekistan and Afghanistan, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), Central Asian Uyghur Hezbollah (Kazakhstan), the Eastern Turkistan Islamic Resistance Movement, Turkistan Party and the United Committee of Uyghur's. According to the PRC authorities, ETIM, and other Islamic terrorists, have killed 162 people in China and wounded 440 in the past 10 years.
These groups pose a threat that is similar to the threat posed by many radical Islamic separatist groups. They want to establish a pan-Islamic country that includes parts of multiple existing nations, including Xinjiang Province in China. The root of the problem goes back a thousand years but the modern roots are linked to the East Turkistan Islamic Republic, that was originally founded in the 1930's. It really only existed for about three months but the independence movement to create an independent country has continued ever since. The PRC is not about to allow one of its provinces to separate itself from China.
On February 25, 1997, the Chinese acknowledge that Islamic terrorists conducted almost simultaneous bombings of three buses in the Xinjiang provincial capital of Urumqi. On March 7, 1997, the PRC has said that three persons were killed and at least eight were injured in a bus bombing in Beijing. While the Chinese tried to suppress the reports, Beijing citizens, at the time, claimed that there were at least two other bomb incidents, one of which may have been blotched. All were allegedly conducted by Uygur separatists. While most of the problems have been in Xinjiang Province, other incidents that may have involved radical Islamic terrorists - including train and bus bombings -- have occurred in Shenyang, Shenzhen, Chengdu, Hunan, Guangzhou and Xian.
During the 1980's, the Chinese, just like the Americans, supported the Taliban and Afghan/Islamic groups that would challenge the Soviet Union's occupation of Afghanistan. After the Soviets left, the new Taliban rulers began to host and train a variety of extremist groups including those that wanted to break Xinjiang away from China - not to mention conduct bombings in the US and around the world. The Chinese have said that between 100 and 500 insurgents received training on terrorism in Afghanistan. Some allegedly received help and training from al Qaeda.
China has worked hard to keep Xinjiang Province from becoming an isolated Islamic province. They have injected as many as 18 million ethnic Han Chinese into Xinjiang, in an effort to make the province less "Islamic." They have also designated the province as a semi autonomous region. But instead of diminishing the problem, these moves have resulted in strengthening the radical resolve to make the province independent and have resulted in more Islamic youth joining the ranks of the radical separatists. As recently as a year ago, the Chinese have acknowledged that they raided terrorist training camps within their borders and claim that there are terrorist sanctuaries in Pakistan and Turkey, as well as Afghanistan.
At this very moment, radical Islamic terrorist groups are trying to decide if they should attempt a terrorist attack in Beijing or China during the high visibility Olympics. While the movements want to support independence for Xinjiang there is reportedly a lot of debate about whether embarrassing the Chinese could backfire and strengthen the terrorist's most bitter enemy - the United States. Regardless of how centrally controlled groups such as some components of al Qaeda ultimately decide to go, it is important to understand that there are the equivalent of "home grown" terrorists within China that will make their own decision regardless of outside influences.
Certainly any company that will have personnel in China and Beijing for the Olympics should be monitoring the terrorist threat and should have appropriate plans to deal with that threat. BSSG has expertise in developing emergency plans for companies in Beijing, and throughout the PRC. We will continue to monitor the all-hazards threats faced in China and everywhere in the world. It is a sad commentary that the Olympics might become a venue for terrorism but history has made it clear that such a possibility is very real and common sense dictates that you should be prepared and, with less than a year to go, now is the time to plan accordingly.
.
www.internationalbssg.com
Domestic Desk
The Analysis Brief has been regularly discussing terrorism and how to identify a terrorist. The problem is effectively illustrated by the arrest of two students from the University of South Florida on August 4, 2007 in South Carolina. The incident involved two Egyptian born students at the University of South Florida (USF). Studying engineering on the USF campus means these two were on campus not far from the BSSG offices in Tampa. They were stopped by police, in South Carolina, for speeding but after the stop, police noticed some possibly deceptive actions on the part of the students and, during a search of the vehicle, police found some low-grade explosives consisting of potassium nitrate, Karo syrup and kitty litter, inside of PVC pipe. The syrup and kitty litter are used to keep the potassium nitrate substance in a usable form. All of this mixture was then, allegedly placed inside four sections of PVC pipe. There was also an electric drill, 20 feet of safety fuse and a gasoline container full of a liquid substance found in the vehicle's trunk.
Defense attorneys and family members of the two Egyptians have denied the two were potential terrorists. They have attempted to focus on the fact that the intent of the two cannot be known. While intent is always an issue in a criminal case, intent is often implied from other evidence and that is what will probably have to be done in this matter.
Some of the early hype had the PVC and mixture of potassium nitrate, Karo syrup and kitty litter listed as a "pipe bomb." Technically what the students had was not a pipe bomb but it could well be termed an "improvised explosive device," commonly termed an "IED." Legally, authorities are even hesitant to use the term: "destructive device." In spite of the implications that this was a "profile" inspired arrest, and these two were just innocently carrying low grade explosives to use as fireworks, the facts make it clear that possession of PVC IED's is a concern whenever it is discovered. It is regularly investigated and should be. There have been a number of arrests of individuals, including many not associated with radical Islamic terrorism, because they had an explosive mixture such as black powder or potassium nitrate and PVC. Arrests of individuals who have explosive substances inside of PVC pipes are not restricted to individuals of only one ethnic background or religion.
In fact, it is worth noting that PVC is frequently used around the world, including in Iraq, to build low-grade explosive devices. What was missing in the items listed as found during the search of the two individual's vehicle was any kind of anti-personnel "shrapnel" such as BB's, ball bearings or nails, which are often added to PVC IED's. Given the facts released thus far, we doubt if these devices were going to be used to conduct an imminent bombing. More likely these PVC devices were being used for training purposes. They could also be used a diversionary or harassing explosive device. As a "fit" with the training aspect of the allegations about the activities of these two students, PVC pipe was regularly used during training on pipe bombs and other IED's when the US government conducted training on IED's. The use of PVC pipe captures some of the essence of a pipe bomb without some of the risks of using metal pipe.
Some have also tried to say that since the PVC was not capped, the devices were not truly bombs. While it is true that without some method of closing off the PVC pipe, the mixture would not truly "explode," it should also be known that not placing a cap on a pipe bomb is standard practice for attempting to safely transport a pipe bomb. You do not put the caps on until you are nearly ready to launch an attack. The lack of a cap simply indicates is that the two students were trying to more safely transport the explosives and there was no imminent threat.
Since the arrest took place near the Goose Creek Naval Weapons Station, there were those who immediately jumped to the conclusion that these two were planning on attacking this military installation. Those trying to defend the two students, then countered by pointing out the students were unprepared to take on the security elements at the base. It the eyes of defense attorneys, this means there was no intent to attack the US military. It is inaccurate to say that these individuals would not be a threat to a defended military installation. It all depends on how you define a "threat." A threat is not just the direct attack threat to the facilities on the installation proper. As we have learned in Iraq, Afghanistan and countless attacks on the military going all the way back to the author's time in Vietnam, it is not that difficult to penetrate the long perimeter of a military installation. The key is to find a remote area. An installation fence generally provides no more than five to ten seconds of delay in entry for someone with even rudimentary training. More importantly, the theory of warfare that we see being used by radical Islamic terrorists is to not directly attack military forces on their home installation. Instead, they will attempt to attack the military forces when they leave the installation and are in public - in vehicles or in shops/restaurants. Or they will use a stand-off attack. 90 percent of all US military casualties in Iraq are off the installation. So, this incident should legitimately be a concern regardless of whether or not these two students intended to attack a military installation.
Additionally, it is possible that the two men could have been conducting pre-operational intelligence gathering and familiarization. As we noted earlier, we suspect the two were not about to imminently try and use explosive devices on the Goose Creek Naval Weapons Station, or any other specific target. That part of the defense argument seems valid. But it is a poor argument overall. If you review radical Islamic groups training materials and their modus operandi in Iraq and Afghanistan you will see that Islamic radicals rarely attack a military installation directly. The argument that the two had nothing in the way of equipment that would have allowed them to effectively attack an installation directly, and take on the installation security forces, is of no relevance in terms of whether or not their target might have been military forces from any installation.
Additionally, the student's claim that the devices were simply "fireworks" is not believable. Potassium nitrate in PVC is NOT fireworks in any traditional sense of fireworks. The author has seen fireworks used at wedding ceremonies and other celebrations in places like Pakistan and elsewhere the Middle East. These devices do not qualify for fireworks there or here, if you define fireworks as most of us do. If these items were fireworks, why were there no other type of fireworks of any kind and what was the reason for the fireworks? These devices were clearly IED's. They may have been training IED's but they were IED's.
Their intended use is still unclear but, again, we suspect the devices were used for general training on how to construct a pipe bomb. The training video found on the computer and YouTube, a drill and safety fuse indicate there was some preparation to make the devices work.
Obviously there is more that will be learned about other evidence seized during legal searches and what the two students have been doing and where they have been during the past six months or year. We commend the police and Joint Terrorism Task Force for a good, proper response to suspicious activities that fit a terrorist modus operandi. Time will tell but we believe there is an excellent chance that these arrests disrupted two individuals who were, as a minimum, enthralled with aspects of radical Islamic terrorism and may well have moved onto implementing more disconcerting action steps.
Local news media have covered this story extensively in Tampa because of the University of South Florida connection. We have attempted to help media like the Tampa Tribune to more effectively report on this incident but the media are often more interested in publishing the outlandish comments of defense lawyers, family members and general speculation. We hope this article will help to deal with some of the mistakes we believe are being promulgated by the media.
More Information
Red Team Concept
"Emerge from the void, strike at vulnerable points, shun places that are defended, attack in unexpected quarters." -- Ts'ao Kung
"You can be sure of succeeding in your attacks if you only attack places which are undefended." -- Sun Tzu
As these ancient Chinese experts on warfare indicate, our adversaries like to study us, determine our weaknesses, find our vulnerabilities and exploit them.
The challenge for security professionals is to identify those vulnerabilities before the "bad guys" do. It may sound easy. We have found most security professionals like to think they know the strengths and weaknesses of their programs. We regularly hear people say: we are the best one's to assess our program because we know the company. But it is amazing how quickly we can develop "blind spots" and that is the value of a third party assisting you in identifying weaknesses.
The use of a "Red Team" concept is one excellent tool that can be used to reveal weaknesses. The purpose of identifying these weaknesses is the ultimate goal of enabling you to understand what new countermeasures need to be employed to protect your assets. A Risk Assessment, that includes a Red Team test of the existing security approaches, is an extremely valuable tool in achieving that goal.
This is an example of how that concept can work.
During a strike detail, the security company's management decided they needed to test their security team's effectiveness. They had several sites to cover but were concerned with one of the sites, in particular. That particular site maintained several databases that housed all the customer information for the entire east coast, along with all the statistical information for the company nationwide.
A "Red Team" test was designed to see how far a motivated, disgruntled employee could get within the facility without being discovered and what kind of damage could be done. The Red Team came to understand that the facility was very open during operations and there was little or no control over secure areas. This meant that all the employees had knowledge of where critical areas were located and had unchallenged access to those areas.
The Red Team's task was to attempt to enter the facility and place markers (match books from the hotel where the operators were staying) throughout the facility, and see if they could do so without getting caught. After a several days of surveillance the Red Team decided to do a penetration test during the night shift because it was determined that was when security was most lax and there were the fewest security personnel on duty.
The Red Team entered the facility through the main gate while the security officer was on patrol and that position was unmanned. The team had determined that it took the officer ten minutes to complete his rounds and the security officer was very predictable. Upon entering the facility the team timed its movements to avoid patrols by other security officers. Since the patrol officers never varied their routes and never stopped or doubled back, it was an easy task. The entire facility was approximately twenty thousand square feet and there were five security officers patrolling at any given time.
The Red Team began to making its way through the facility, placing markers in critical areas. Some of the areas included a compressed gas cylinder storage room and the server room. One of the Red Team members was even able to access the server using a security code found in an employee's desk drawer. With physical access to the server room, the team member was able to down load several large files containing proprietary information. As the team moved through the facility they made their way to the office of the company's Vice President's office and were surprised to discover a covert camera monitoring system complete with monitors, pan tilt zoom cameras, a digital video recorder, remote data backup, and remote viewer -- none of which were in use and upon further inspection had apparently not been in use for over a year. The system monitored all critical areas, entrances, loading docks, even the lunch room. That system could have been disabled.
The Red Team had placed a total of 32 markers throughout the facility and even placed one under a fire extinguisher less than ten feet away from one of the security officers. During the debriefing, the security officers were all questioned about any activity they had seen the night before, when the test was taking place. None of them said they saw anything. Then one officer said he had seen a bunch of match books on the floor that he didn't remember seeing before but he had not reported it nor did he look around even though, in retrospect, he thought it was strange. Apparently the Red Team member that had placed the match book on the fire extinguisher unintentionally had dropped a few extra books on the floor when he had reached into his pocket to get the matchbook he placed on the fire extinguisher.
The exercise identified vulnerabilities and remotivated security officers to improve their professionalism.
It is important for security management professionals to realize that being closed minded and thinking they have "good" security is a counterproductive way of thinking. If you believe there is no need for improvement in your security program, you have a recipe for disaster. No one has all the answers but if teamed with a good, professional third party, the resulting "team" can ultimately help provide a safer and more secure environment.
Part of the reason there is a security function is to protect life and property. That means putting aside preconceptions and ego. The BSSG team has done many hundreds of assessments and Red Team penetrations. We have NEVER conducted an assessment or security test that did not identify some shortcomings. This includes some of the supposedly most secure facilities in the world. Guess what... no security is perfect and you can always improve.
The good news is that an outsider and a Red Team that can clearly illustrate some of the areas that need improvement will accomplish more than the same internal security individuals, from the company, saying the same things and taking the same approaches. It is just the way human beings function. Contact BSSG if you want a professional assessment and/or Red Team test. It can help breathe life into your security team and revitalize your program.
More Information
Chemical Corner
FARMERS AND SMALL BUSINESSES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY CHEMICAL RULES
BSSG has been reporting for months now on the need for businesses with certain chemicals, and quantities of certain chemicals, to fill out a questionnaire for the Department of Homeland Security. Now it seems some farmers and agriculture companies are frustrated with the Homeland Security Department's new chemical rules. It appears that large propane tanks and some fertilizers might fall under regulations proposed by the Department. For agriculture that means they might be affected and they are afraid of the potential costs associated with an expectation of improved security.
Most farmers, of course, don't "get it" because they do not do the research on how terrorists operate and why terrorists would be interested in their propane or fertilizer. They key is the basic threat assessment principle that says that if you are a farmer, you have to think like a terrorist, not a farmer. One farmer, at a poultry farm, was quoted as saying he could not "imagine" that a propane tank could pose a threat in that rural area. Duh...who says the stolen propane has to stay in the rural area? Would the theft be immediately detected? Would it be linked to potential terrorism?
In reality, propane can be mobile and has been used in past terrorist incidents. Propane has been repeatedly used in Iraq to build bombs. Propane has also been used in bombings in London, Glasgow, Spain and Germany. The trouble with the farmer's thinking is that it belies a core problem... people who cannot "imagine" a terrorist wanting their propane or fertilizer; naturally don't think they need to do anything to protect these potential dangerous weapons.
Some industry lobbying groups, and the politicians in their pockets, are also complaining that Homeland Security is casting "too wide a net" if it includes their constituents. These sources have noted that the new Homeland Security regulations could affect not only chemical giants but also can include some "mom-and-pop" dry cleaners, university labs, medical facilities and even camping facilities. Heaven forbid that any of these smaller entities should have to consider security!
As expected, when politicians flex their muscles, Homeland Security often caves in. One thing that Michael Chertoff knows is where his bread is buttered. As a result, Homeland Security officials have already said the regulations will be "adjusted." Let's hope they are not adjusted too much!
There are some, including BSSG, who think the basic surveys should include all businesses that manufacture, use, store or distribute a variety of chemicals and propane that meets a reasonable standard. With propane, the "trigger" quantity is 7500 pounds or 1785 gallons. This isn't just your backyard barbecue quantity. One can argue whether or not a particular business could be a "target" of terrorists but if they have chemicals that can be used for terrorism and these chemicals are virtually unprotected, common sense says you should error on the side of at least considering how a terrorist could use them and require some protective security measures.
BSSG will continue to monitor what happens to the regulations on chemical storage. If you have quantities of some potentially dangerous chemicals and are not sure what to do, contact BSSG for assistance.
More Information
Incident Management Team Room
SPECIAL PRODUCT REVIEW - NIMS/ICS PRO EDITION
The "NIMS/ICS Pro Edition" [National Incident Management System/Incident Command System] DVD was developed to achieve several specific objectives and to meet educational goals. Importantly, it recognizes that students have to pay attention to get something out of a DVD. There is no one there to get the attention of someone whose mind is wandering. Recognizing this shortcoming in many of the existing training products on the market, this program was designed with the objective of getting, and then holding the attention of students.
Each new chapter starts with compelling emergency footage of historic significance and it is all placed against mood appropriate music. These emergencies include the following:
Compilation of Variety of Emergencies (Overview Chapter)
World Trade Center Attack (Incident Commander Chapter)
Hurricane Katrina (Command Staff)
138,000 acre Hayman Fire (Operations Section)
Terrorist Attack on Beslan Russia School #1 (Planning Section)
Tsunami, Indian Ocean (Logistics Section)
Murray Federal Building Bombing in Oklahoma (Finance & Administration Section)
In order to promote a unified concept for emergency operations, chapters are designed to include as many types of emergency agencies possible. Chapters include footage and interviews of law enforcement officers, municipal and wild land fire personnel, municipal managers, and federal officials. Unlike many other course materials, the NIMS/ICS Pro Edition is segmented into chapters based on job responsibility. This provides flexibility for educational reinforcement based on a job assignment.
Curriculum & Usage
The Pro Edition was designed around the "as taught by DHS [Department of Homeland Security]" standard for ICS-100 & ICS-200, as well as the NWCG/NIFC I-100 & I-200 curriculum. It is meant to be used as part of an overall training strategy that includes classroom instruction and exercises.
Optimally, students should be exposed to the DVD course prior to, or in combination with, classroom instruction. It is also recommended that the course material be reviewed at regular intervals following initial instruction, as part of an overall continuing education strategy.
The curriculum contained on this DVD, is presented in seven separate chapters. Students should watch the "Overview" prior to reviewing subsequent sections. The "Overview" is a summary of the I-100 course material as described above. While the additional six chapters build upon each other and combine to cover the I-200 course series. The DVD was developed to allow viewing of individual chapters, as the instructor deems appropriate or necessary.
With the NIMS Five Year Plan currently being contemplated, the subject of sustainability is a real isssue that warrants consideration by government jurisdictions and private enterprises alike. Annual re- training is also a major reason to consider the "NIMS/ICS Pro Edition." We believe this DVD can be a great additional tool for internal trainers. On the Homeland Security Toolbox product rating scale this product is a "Type 1", our highest rating.
To view video excerpts and more information visit www.nimsvideo.com or call (303) 841-2867.
Enter Coupon Code 15AS786 and receive free Federal Express Ground Shipping with your order.
http://toddmanns.home.att.net/ICSEOCUSAFA.pdf
The World of Industrial Espionage
PRC Once Again Linked to Industrial Espionage
The Analysis Brief has regularly been reporting on Industrial Espionage and has focused considerable attention on the involvement of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in Industrial Espionage. That is because we believe that Industrial Espionage is the most significant security issue facing global businesses. The latest reports indicate that United States (US) businesses alone are losing more than US$250 billion a year to Industrial Espionage. The US Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) reported that it has arrested 25 citizens of the People's Republic of China (PRC) or Chinese Americans, during the past two years, on Industrial Espionage related matters. The FBI has also said that the PRC is the leading espionage threat to the US. We would note that the threat is not just restricted to the US.
That Industrial Espionage threat continues to manifest itself.
In August, a Taiwanese businessman Ko-Suen Moo pleaded guilty for attempting to purchase cruise missiles and other military equipment allegedly intended for the PRC.
In September, Lan Lee, a Chinese American citizen, and Yue Fei Ge, a PRC citizen, were indicted by a Federal Grand Jury for allegedly conspiring to steal technical descriptions of chip development by their employer, Net-Logic Microsystems of Mountain View, California, as well as from the Taiwan Semi-Conductor Manufacturing Company, which has offices in San Jose, California.
While the arrests continue to mount up, the US has, unfortunately, not been doing much more than arresting industrial spies. The follow-up prosecution and penalties have tended to relatively light and thus provide little or no deterrence for future spying. Even though the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 has provided the US with a means to help companies protect their sensitive business information, such as trade secrets, the government rarely uses its most powerful provision that applies to crimes that "benefit any foreign government, foreign instrumentality or foreign agent."
Instead, most of the prosecutions have been plea bargained down to relatively light sentences. For example, in 2001 three PRC linked individuals - Kai Xu, Yong-Qing Cheng and Hai Lin - were arrested for allegedly stealing sophisticated software developed by Lucent Technologies for handling voice calls over the Internet. At that time, Lucent's Path Star program was reportedly generating US$100 million in annual sales. After the technology was stolen, sales plummeted as competitors offered similar products at a lower price, since the spying companies had no research and development costs to recover. The plea bargained sentences for two of the defendants were reduced to a fine of US$250,000. The third defendant jumped bail and supposedly fled to the PRC.
Businesses need to understand that the US government can assist in after-the-fact prosecutions but the losses can be severe. Every company ultimately must take the initiative and protect its own sensitive trade secrets and research and development information. Failure to have a good and comprehensive Counter Industrial Espionage program will come back to bite companies. Companies should also be aware the threats emanating from the PRC can be significant but the threats are far from restricted to the PRC. BSSG has expertise in developing programs that can help businesses protect their sensitive information from the broad range of Industrial Espionage and other intellectual property related threats. Our goal is to insure your company does not end up being featured in this column as another victim company. History is clear. The threat is there. If you do nothing, inevitably, at some point in time, you will experience the losses associated with Industrial Espionage.
More Information
International Waters
TERRORISM THREAT IN THE PHILIPPINES CONTINUES
The lack of stability in the Philippines continues to be a major business risk factor in that island nation. This past month, the Armed Forces of the Philippines reportedly arrested a number of junior officers who were allegedly plotting yet another military coup to topple the administration of President Gloria Arroyo. This is at least the third coup attempt against the Arroyo administration, an administration that started as a result of the military's involvement in "People's Revolution II."
During this past month, the Philippine legislature has proposed hearings on corruption and vote tampering and the fate of ex-President Joseph Estrada is being decided, after he was convicted of "plundering."
All of these kinds of activities undermine the perceived stability of the government of President Arroyo. Into this perception of government instability, you can now inject the terrorist threat.
Radical Islamic terrorist groups such as the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF), Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG), Raja Solaiman Movement (RSM) and Southeast Asian terrorist group, Jemmah Islamiyah (JI) all are active in the Philippines and advocate the separation of southern islands from the Republic of the Philippines. While the Philippine government has attempted peace talks with some of the groups and has given the southern islands a semi-autonomous standing, members of the groups are inter-mixed and seem to have recently been emboldened by the perceived weakness of the Philippine government. As this is written, there is an offensive against ASG, RSM and JI in the southern islands and interim cease fires are strained between the MNLF and MILF.
Meanwhile, the New People's Army (NPA), the armed branch of the Communist Party of the Philippines, continues to carry out attacks from Mindanao to Central Luzon and the government has ordered an all-out offensive against the NPA, while offering amnesty to some of the NPA cadre. Once again, the NPA has declared it cannot negotiate with the corrupt government leadership and continues its campaign of assassinations, kidnapping and extortion.
BSSG has an office in the Philippines and can assist companies with understanding the full-spectrum of potential threats faced when doing business in the Philippines. There are a number of positive reasons for doing business in the Philippines and BSSG recommends it as a good location for business - but only if companies understand the threats and take appropriate actions to protect themselves from the instability, terrorist, intellectual property and fraud/corruption issues that will inevitably be faced in the Philippines.
September 2007
Greetings!
Business Stratagem Support Group (BSSG)
This is our eighth edition of the Analysis Brief for 2007. Because this month we will be remembering the sixth anniversary of the terrorist attacks of 9/11, this edition will devote several articles to combatting terrorism. Our main goal is to determine if we learned anything about how to better protect ourselves from terrorism, post 9/11. In the United States we have had Presidential commissions, Congressional hearings and many studies about what we did wrong to allow 9/11 attacks to succeed. We have even seen some suggestions about what we can do to improve our security. The United States, for example, created a new Department of Homeland Security to focus on protecting the U.S. from terrorism. But Osama bin Laden is still out there advocating terrorist attacks and our borders are still insecure. We certainly cannot ignore the terrorist threat. In this edition we will examine how you can identify a terrorist and how "red team" countersurveillance techniques have helped to thwart some terrorist attacks. In addition, we will look at some diverse security issues ranging from theft to Industrial Espionage, from incident management and planning to international security issues. BSSG is constantly looking for unique and new approaches to keep the foes of our clients off balance. We hope this edition will provide some education and awareness and will stimulate discussion of the security challenges we face in the 21st Century, within the United States, and around the globe....Flexible innovative solutions for fluid threats!
This Months Featured Article
Identifying Terrorists
|
One of the most challenging problems that we face around the world, in this era of increased terrorism, is how we can identify a terrorist before the terrorist can strike because our goal should be prevention, rather than after-the-fact investigation.
As those responsible for security have worked on this subject, a number of different approaches have emerged. Certainly some possible solutions have more validity than others. Many efforts have become the butt end of jokes for late night comedians or left-wing columnists/pundits. The gist of these jokes and nay-sayer's comments is that they would apparently prefer we just give up because any pro-active approach might also wrongly identify someone who is not a terrorist and cause that individual problems while the truth is being sorted out. In this negative approach you can only conclude that no one's life is worth the hassles.
Certainly, efforts to determine if someone is doing things in support of terrorist goals will not be foolproof. But we believe this offers a good opportunity to prevent a terrorist act and potentially save lives. That (saving lives), we believe, should be our primary and over-riding goal. In our opinion, saving a number of lives should take priority over a little hassle. This is the concept we operate under when we screen people at airports, courthouses and government buildings or large events and the courts have thankfully upheld this approach.
What emerges from studies and efforts to date is this: You cannot identify a terrorist based solely on appearance, nationality or language. Certainly Middle Eastern males, in their twenties or thirties, are going to be the most likely radical Islamic based terrorists. However, there are obviously a far larger number of Middle Eastern males in their twenties or thirties, who then fit that description, but are not terrorists. If they were the only terrorists out there we would recommend a focus on that profile, regardless. The problem is there are others who are terrorists but they do not fit that profile. For example, British authorities determined that radical Islamic terrorists were preparing to smuggle explosives onto aircraft using women and even children, who would also have died in the ensuing attack. Caucasian women were recruited and traveled to the Middle East intent on carrying out suicide bombings. In just the past couple of weeks, several German nationals had been recruited and were planning to carry out bombing attacks inside Germany. Radical Islamic terrorists also come from India, Africa, Indonesia, the Philippines and many other ethnic groups. Then there are the environmental terrorist groups such as Earth Liberation Front or the animal rights terrorist groups such as Animal Liberation Front. And, of course, there are a number of right-wing extremist groups that have resorted to terrorism. None of these latter categories fit the Middle Eastern male in his twenties or thirties profile and it is worth remembering that before 9/11 the most deadly terrorist attack in the United States was the attack on the Federal Building in Oklahoma City by right-wing extremists in the form of Caucasian males like the late Timothy McVeigh.
So, if ethnic background and religion are not good criteria - what can we do?
There is something that almost all of these diverse terrorist groups do that makes them vulnerable to detection. It is something that radical Islamic terrorist groups do but right-wing extremists and left-wing extremists also do. It is something even criminal elements often do. That is -- gathering information to enable them to do their targeting and planning.
It is important to understand that those who commit terrorist acts need to gather information and conduct surveillance on possible targets. This is the time when terrorists are especially vulnerable to detection. They will try and do this in a low-keyed manner and hope that most people will simply shrug off what they see or not pay attention at all. Unfortunately, that is usually what happens. After the bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, several embassy employees who survived the attack revealed they had observed some individuals doing some strange videotaping but had not reported this to security. Their unwillingness to report someone holding a video camera on a stick up over the embassy walls cost some of their fellow employees their lives.
What this means is that we have to put some focus on determining suspicious activities that will allow law enforcement or security to zero in the most likely potential threats and then do further investigation to determine if the activities were, in fact, "innocent" or were more sinister. We know that just investigating suspicious activities can cause a terrorist group to cancel or postpone their attack.
So, the key is not identifying a terrorist, per se, but rather identifying potential terrorist (or criminal) related activities. This, in turn, can lead us to identifying the potential terrorist. In essence, then, we should be looking for "suspicious activities." The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has been preaching this during every alert. The problem is that many people are unclear on what this term "suspicious activities" means.
We can learn a lot about what we should be looking for from the terrorist training methodology and operational cycles they use. What the terrorists do is, incidentally, not different than non-terrorist related "intelligence" gathering activities; those used for military or criminal activities, etc. The captured training documents and debriefings of terrorists indicate that the approach of today's terrorist (or criminal) is the same thing law enforcement and security should have been focusing on for decades.
For this reason, when we talk about identifying a terrorist we will actually focus on identifying potential terrorist intelligence gathering and preparatory activities. What we recommend you look for is based on analyzing terrorist manuals that go back to the era of the Viet Cong in Vietnam, the Red Army Faction or Weather Underground during the 1970's and 1980's, or the al Qaeda trained terrorists of today.
The following should cause a heightened sense of concern by anyone who detects it:
- · Unusual interest or observations of potential targets
Targets (according to captured documents) are most likely to include: airports, water/waste water processing plants and water supplies, dams, bridges, tunnels, power plants/substations, transmission towers, pipelines, tank farms, military installations, government buildings, hospitals, health research facilities, communications facilities/towers, schools, high-rise buildings, shopping malls, historical sites or national monuments, event/sports centers, entertainment centers
- · Unusual photographing or video taping
Especially if that seems to focus on security measures, structural components, parking areas, delivery areas - which are not the areas where most people would take pictures
- · Individuals taking notes or sketching, drawing diagrams or annotating maps at these sites
- · Individuals loitering or sitting in vehicles or sitting/standing near potential targets apparently observing activities and taking notes or dictating into a tape recorder, typing on a computer, etc.
The U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations has some excellent descriptions of potentially suspicious behaviors that warrant reporting under their Eagle Eyes antiterrorism program. These behaviors are based on techniques used by terrorists and on their known modus operandi - the steps their training manual outlines for planning and carrying out a terrorist operation:
- · Surveillance: The activities described above.
- · Elicitation: People trying to gain information about operations, capabilities and people. As an example, in one instance terrorists joined groups that were smoking outside the high rise building. They asked if anyone ever checked for identification on the company shuttle. This should have caused someone to report such questioning.
- · Tests of Security: Attempts to penetrate physical security or do something unusual to see if it draws a response and how long that response takes.
- · Acquiring supplies: Purchasing or stealing explosives or components of explosives (especially large quantities), weapons, ammunition, detonators, timers, acquiring uniforms, decals, passes or badges.
- · Persons who appear out-of-place: People who don't seem to belong in the workplace, neighborhood, business establishment, etc. This is a difficult one but often one's "gut" feeling has some merit.
- · Dry run: Putting people into position and moving them around without actually committing an act. Take note of people moving around from place-to-place without any apparent purpose for doing it.
- · Deploying assets: Getting people and supplies into position to carry out an operation. This is the last chance to alert authorities before a terrorist act occurs. Look for people loading up vehicles with weapons or explosives, parking a vehicle in an inappropriate location or people who seem out-of-place standing by at a location as if waiting for something to happen. A good example of this was the attack on Khobar Towers in Saudia Arabia or the recent attack of a night club in London. An individual stopped a vehicle, pulled it up close to a fence or sidewalk and then jumped out and ran away. If you can react quickly when you see this, you have the potential to save lives and that is what happened when a lookout on the roof of the Towers spotted this suspicious "deploying assets" action and began alerting personnel in the towers to get out of their room. His ability to allow individuals to quickly evacuate saved many lives.
Of course, as we have indicated, it does no good for someone to observe these strange activities if they do not report them to security. Security should be training everyone to be their "eyes and ears" for both spotting and then reporting unusual or strange activities. Security can then work with law enforcement to further investigate the situation to determine if it might have potential terrorist implications. Security and law enforcement should have a widely publicized and advertised means to take reports, even anonymously. This can include hotlines and email or text messages. Security and law enforcement must never belittle those reporting but should encourage them to continue reporting, even if their report is off-base or a false alarm.
Part of training employees or families to report suspicious activity is to always pay attention to what is going on around them and what is needed to make a report worthwhile. There are two key elements in a good, worthwhile report:
The first is timeliness. Those making reports should do so as quickly as possible after observing something suspicious happening.
The second is accuracy. Those making the reports should report only what they saw or heard nothing more. They should strive to capture the five "W's" - who, what, when, where and why. When describing a person they should strive to remember and report: whether the individual was male or female, approximate age, size, race, hair color/style, facial hair, scars, tattoos and disabilities.
One organization uses the acronym "SALUTE" to help remind those reporting of what is needed for a good report:
S - Size (Number of people and physical descriptions)
A - Activity (Describe exactly what they were doing)
L - Location (Provide the exact location/address)
U - Uniform (Describe what they were wearing including hats and shoes)
T - Time (Provide date, time and duration of activity observed)
E - Equipment (Describe any equipment they were using including the make, model, color, license plate number of any vehicles involved)
BSSG does not claim to have a corner on the market of what is a suspicious activity but we do have years of experience in education and awareness programs and how to encourage employees and citizens to hone their observation skills and feel comfortable about reporting what they see. We believe this is the key to identifying a terrorist before the terrorist act takes place. If you would like to learn more about this approach, contact any of our BSSG offices.
| Red Team Concept |
|
Countersurveillances Helped With Terrorism Investigation in Germany
As if to reinforce the theme that it is difficult to spot a terrorist and our comment that you cannot focus on a particular ethnic background, on September 6, 2007, German authorities arrested three individuals who were accused of plotting to detonate car bombs designed to kill Americans (and Germans) in Germany. German authorities are supposedly seeking up to seven other individuals who were allegedly involved in the plot.
Two of the three initial suspects were German nationals and at least one, if not both, were Caucasian. One was a Turkish citizen, which is also disconcerting because Germany has the largest number of Turkish immigrants and workers of any country in Europe. One of the German nationals was Fritz Gelowicz, a 28-year-old who was born in Munich and, most recently, lived in Neu-Ulm.
His identification with the terrorist group was based on classic, good police work. It involved putting the pieces of the puzzle together and it is a good example of the kinds of things that can be done to sort a terrorist out from among normal citizens.
Reports indicate Gelowicz converted to Islam and became an active member of a mosque in Ulm, Germany. His name initially came to the attention of authorities when he was detained during a 2005 police raid of a Muslim neighborhood in Bavaria. At some point in time, German and U.S. authorities cooperated in determining that Gelowicz, and other suspected terrorists, had gone to Pakistan to receive some training. On New Years Eve of 2006/New Years Day 2007, Gelowicz was spotted driving around U.S. military barracks in Hanau, Germany where he was described as conducting "casing" or "scouting" activities. Coupling this observation with cellular telephone intercepts from Pakistan, the investigation became intensive and German authorities employed more than 300 agents to surveil the group members. They also worked with American authorities and employed electronic communications interceptions and other investigative techniques that meant they could hear the alleged terrorists talking about their intense hatred of Americans and talking about attacking different airports, pubs and discotheques that they had determined were favorite hangouts of American military personnel. Finally, the terrorists supposedly settled on the Frankfurt Airport and Ramstein Air Base as their primary targets.
The travel to Pakistan was clearly another piece of the puzzle that indicated a potential problem. At least one of the indivudals involved supposedly traveled to Pakistan in 2005 and others traveled in 2006. While there, intelligence sources were able to determine the three received training on organizing a terrorist cell and conducting terrorist operations, including vehicular borne explosive devices from Islamic Jihad Union, an al Qaeda affiliated radical Islamic group originally founded in Uzbekistan. Additionally, as they returned to Germany, the group began acquiring large quantities of hydrogen peroxide. Apparently no one in the Germany company that sold them the hydrogen peroxide was concerned. Such large quantities of hydrogen peroxide could be used, with another chemical, to make bombs that could trigger explosions equivalent to 500 kilograms of TNT.
These chemicals had initially been secretly stored at a holiday home in the Black Forest. Not long ago, the group moved the explosive materials to a rented safe house on the borders of the state of Hesse. This is another technique used by terrorists that could potentially result in their detection. If landlords had checked and found quantities of chemicals it could have been a key tip for police. In this case, fortunately, the police were already monitoring the cell. Apparently the chemicals were starting to deteriorate, they were located near US air bases and the cell had acquired military grade detonators. It now looked as if the group was ready to strike. Reports say interceptions indicated they were under orders to strike before September 15. It is also worth noting that the cell had also been "spooked" by a routine, unrelated police traffic stop at a checkpoint . As a result, the cell decided to move their attack forward and that is when the police intervened.
It is interesting that there has been a terror alert regarding threats to US facilities in Germany since April of 2007. At that time the US Embassy in Berlin issued a warning to Americans living in Germany regarding an increased threat of terrorism. In April 2007, U.S. increased security at government facilities following reports that suspected terrorists had conducted surveillance of the U.S. military's Patch Barracks facility near Stuttgart, Germany. In May 2007, the German media said that alert was based on German converts and Turkish Islamic radicals who, coincidently, belonged to the Islamic Jihad Union.
In both the Patch Barracks and the Hanau arracks incidents the key was identifying individuals who were "casing" the facilities.
This is why we regularly talk about the importance of good, countersurveillance operations. As we noted in the Analysis Brief earlier this year, travel to Pakistan can be another reason to look more closely. Acquiring storage buildings or residences where the individuals change the locks and keep the blinds pulled can be an indication that something not entirely "up front" is going on inside
Clearly countersurveillance is a technique that can help detect terrorist casing activities. BSSG can provide training on terrorism and countersurveillance. BSSG also has a team of individuals who are trained in conducting countersurveillances to detect potential terrorists, thieves or kidnappers.
More Information |
CAPP Comprehensive Asset Protection Program

HOME BUILDERS DEAL WITH APPLIANCE THEFT BY MAKING IT EASIER, NOT HARDER TO STEAL
If there are not enough problems plaguing the home sales and construction industry, thieves are now stealing appliances and other materials from construction sites and their activities are costing the home building industry at least US$5 billion a year, according to the National Association of Home Builders.
That means that the cost of a new home, with demand dropping, is increased by between 1 and 2 percent of the value because the losses attributed to the thefts are being built into the price of the home. Unfortunately for builders, it is becoming more and more difficult to pass on expenses in a deflated new home market.
The Washington Post recent reported that in the Washington, DC area, millions of dollars of new appliances have disappeared from new homes. Thieves simply smash in the door of a vacant new home and grab appliances or other high value times. Not only do the home builders have to replace the appliances, they also must deal with the damaged doors or windows and even damaged floors as the stolen appliances gouge the floors as the thieves drag them out of the house.
So... what are home builders doing to deal with this theft problem? According to the Post article, in Maryland, Virginia and D.C., the builders have stopped putting doors on the houses. They apparently believe the theft is inevitable so are limiting the cost of collateral damage. Some have even provided mats on the floor so that thieves have an easier time and do less damage.
From our perspective, that is a crazy response to a theft issue. That is especially true because there is an alternative. Our Comprehensive Asset Protection Program could seriously disrupt these theft approaches without a huge cost. If you are a home builder or are in the construction business and you believe these theft losses are hurting your bottom line, get it touch with BSSG and discuss how our Comprehensive Asset Protection Program (CAPP) can help you turn the situation around.
|
|
 |
Chemical Corner |
Chemical Assessment Questionnaire Inputs Are Due Soon
The Department of Homeland Security has adopted 6 CFR Part 27, a new regulation mandated by Congress. The regulation is intended to fill a security gap in anti-terrorism efforts within the United States that identifies facilities that have chemicals on site that are deemed at a potentially high level of risk for release, theft, or sabotage. Their security will need to be analyzed, and, if necessary, improved.
Individual states, counties and local law enforcement are taking different approaches for helping facilities deal with the new requirement. Often the local emergency management or fire department knows about the chemical and are trying to notify those with chemicals of interest and get them to complete and submit the Chemical Security Assessment (CSAT) Top-Screen.
The CSAT Top-Screen is a questionnaire regarding the chemicals manufactured, processed, used, stored at or distributed by each facility. Based on the results of the CSAT Top-Screen facilities will be placed in one of four risk based tiers. DHS will require facilities preliminarily placed in Tiers 1-3 to complete a CSAT Security Vulnerability Assessment and develop CSAT Site Security Plan. The CSAT Top-Screen questionnaire, Security Vulnerability Assessment tool, and Site Security Plan template are online tools that DHS will require all regulated facilities to use.
The Top-Screen must be completed online within 60-calendar days of the effective date of the final Appendix A Chemicals of Interest list. DHS expects to finalize Appendix A very soon. Failure to complete a CSAT Top-Screen within the timeframe provided may result in civil penalties, a Department of Homeland Security audit and inspection, or an order to cease operations.
Companies or entities that have chemicals on site should go to www.DHS.gov/chemicalsecurity and follow the registration instructions to access the CSAT to make certain. Once DHS validates a facility's registration, DHS will notify the company facility about how to access the Top-Screen and other CSAT tools. A list of CSAT Top-Screen questions and user instructions are also available online at http://www.dhs.gov/xprevprot/programs/gc_1169501486197.shtm.
A full text version of the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Interim Final Rule (6 CFR Part 27) and Proposed Appendix A: DHS Chemicals of Interest are available online at http://www.dhs.gov/xprevprot/laws/gc_1166796969417.shtm
BSSG has considerable expertise in chemical related risk assessments and has the capability to assist companies in completing their requirements and developing any follow-on security measures that might be appropriate. If you are not certain, or if you could use assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
|
|
Incident Management Team Room |
EASTERN COLORADO INCIDENT MANAGEMENT TEAM FORMS
In the wake of winter blizzards and a recent tornado, a multi-county Eastern Colorado Incident Management Team (IMT) has been formed in the state of Colorado.
On October 3rd the new all hazard IMT will conduct its first official training session at the Colorado State Emergency Operations Center in Centennial, Colorado. Each of the new team members has been carefully screened and evaluated by advisors, for inclusion on the team.
The team members come from a multitude of disciplines including: Emergency Management, Law Enforcement, Fire EMS and Public Health. These team members were drawn from three of the nine all-hazard regions in the State -- the Northeast, Southeast and South Regions. This geographic expanse encompasses some 22 counties and literally one-third of the entire state of Colorado.
The 20 team members will include a well-balanced mixture of Type III, Type II and Type I certifications from both the State's all-hazards certification process and the National Wildfire Coordinating Group certification process.
The team is now on an ambitious training schedule, including a green cell team capabilities assessment in October when they will train with elements of the Colorado National Guard's CBRNE Enhanced Response Force Package; mandatory team training at the winter Colorado Wildfire and Incident Management Academy in Sterling; and the participating and managing several high profile planned event assignments in the state.
For the first year, the team will be going onto an on-call rotation. Significantly, they will be made available to assist the Emergency Operations Center for the duration of the Democratic National Convention, which will be held in Denver next year.
Incident Command System/
Emergency Operations Center Interface
One Day Workshop
October 31st 2007
Hosted at the United States Air Force Academy
|
|
The World of Industrial Espionage
|

PLA-LINKED HACKERS GO AFTER MULTIPLE TARGETS
Just in the past month there have been a flurry of reports in the media about hacking attempts by the Chinese military against government/military entities in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and even France.
As expected, the People's Republic of China has denied being involved in any of the hacking attacks. Knowledgeable sources make it clear that, in spite of their efforts at creating "plausible deniability," a number of the attacks were clearly traced to Guangzhou and Beijing, where the Second Department of the PLA (military intelligence) is known to have established intelligence operational centers. Last month, Analysis Brief reported about the links between PLA intelligence operations and Zhonghsan University's Chinese Center for Asian Pacific Studies in Guangzhou. The University has a charter to conduct "research and gather information related to defense technology."
Chinese intelligence efforts to penetrate U.S. military and corporate databases are well-known and have been going on for at least a decade. In 2003, it was revealed that the U.S. Department of Defense had a program code named "Titan Rain" to try and counter attempted penetrations by the PLA. In spite of the Chinese government denials, even non-government groups such as the SANS Institute have, as far back as 2005, concluded that attacks on the DoD, NASA, Sandia Laboratories and Redstone Arsenal came from the PRC military.
According to sources, the British Ministry of Defense has been "seriously" attacked by the Chinese military more than nine times since 2002. During the past several weeks the British media has been reporting there have also been recent attacks by Chinese hackers against Britain's Parliament and Foreign Office.
All of this comes just days after the German counterintelligence service (BfV) announced that Chinese hackers broke into computers of Angela Merkel's Chancellery and three other German ministries just before her state trip to China in August.
Most recently, the French government acknowledged that what spokes persons called "services of the French state" had been attacked by hackers based in the People's Republic of China during the past several months. According to the Secretary-General of National Defense (SGDN) Francis Delon, the attacks took place but had not formally been tracked to the PLA. Internal sources have disclosed the French ministry of defense was one of the principle targets and therefore concluded the PLA was probably involved.
It is clear that there is a substanial espionage threat, including Industrial Espionage, emanating from the People's Republic of China and the huge presence of American, British, French and German businesses in China should mean this risk is fully understood and is built into business planning.
BSSG has expertise in countering Industrial Espionage at home and abroad. Contact any of our offices to get help in protecting your trade secrets and intellectual property.
INDIAN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE OUTSTANDING AT INDUSTRIAL ESPIONAGE
India is another major developing center for international businesses. The Analysis Brief has had multiple articles in the past several months about the level of Industrial Espionage that is occurring in India. Now a professional organization that specializes in analyzing national intelligence services has confirmed that India is a hot-bed for espionage. This time the focus is on government sponsored Industrial Espionage.
A private American intelligence news gathering entity, Strategic Forecasting (STRATFOR), has named the Indian Intelligence Bureau (IB) one of the top five best intelligence services in the world when it comes to its ability to conduct physical surveillance, bug hotel rooms or carrying out "black bag jobs" (covert or clandestine surreptitious entries into offices and homes to obtain information.). According to STRATFOR, the IB has special expertise in lock picking, safe cracking, getting key impressions, finger printing, photography, electronic surveillance (audio) "bugging" or visual (micro cameras), mail manipulation (flaps and seals) and forgery.
While India is battling radical Islamic terrorists allegedly supported from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Kashmir, the IB has apparently shown more skill at stealing economic secrets from high-tech firms than detecting and eliminating terrorists. According to sources, the IB has a number of Industrial Espionage operations underway in India's information technology centers in Bangalore and Hyderbad.
Companies that do business in India should be aware of the threats and take the risks into account when developing business strategies
More Information |
 |
International Waters |
SECURITY SITUATION IN THE PHILIPPINES REMAINS VOLATILE
The situation in the Philippines continues to be unsettled and unstable.
On August 28, the Dutch Police arrested Jose Marie Sison, in the Netherlands. Sison was one of the founders of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) and was the leader of the New People's Army (NPA), the military wing of the CPP. The NPA has been a terrorist organization in the eyes of most countries for several decades.
The Sison arrest sparked protests by leftist groups at the Embassy of the Netherlands in Manila. Intelligence elements in the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and the Philippine National Police (PNP) immediately went on alert to try and track the NPA, fearing they would launch an attack in sympathy with their leader. In fact, all major intersections in Metro Manila and surrounding cities had checkpoints, primarily focusing on individuals riding motorcycles because the NPA is notorious for motorcycle riding assassination squads known as "Sparrow" hit teams.
All of this comes as the rumors continue to swirl about a possible coup d'etat in Manila. The Chief of Staff for the AFP, General Hermogenes Esperon, Jr., told reporters that the AFP was "100 percent" behind the administration of President Gloria Arroyo. Meanwhile, his actions do not seem to indicate as much confidence as he publicly expressed. The AFP has launched investigations of dissidents within the military and also launched an "education" campaign among junior officers and senior non-commissioned officers, warning them that they will be arrested for mutiny if they attempt to circumvent the electoral process with a military coup. It is worth noting that General Esperon was handpicked by Arroyo to lead the AFP, over several supposedly more qualified officers, because of his loyalty to the president and he and his family have allegedly benefited from that loyalty. In fact, General Esperon's name supposedly shows up in the tapes that may well be aired in the Philippine Senate hearings over voter fraud as the Philippine Senate probes the so-called "Hello Garci" tapes where President Arroyo is allegedly heard encouraging the Election Commissioner to commit voter fraud on her behalf during the 2004 presidential election.
Add all of this to the expected demonstrations that will inevitably come if former president Joseph Estrada is found guilty of corruption in mid-September and the concerns that radical Islamic separatist groups, including the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG), Jemmah Islamiyah, Rajah Solaiman Movement and rogues from the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) are considering bombings in Manila and/or Cebu City to divert pressure on the ASG and MILF in the southern islands.
Finally, leftist sources within the Philippine Senate have warned that President Arroyo should not use a terrorist incident as grounds for declaring martial law and claim that Arroyo and Esperon, along with others, are already planning to shut-down opposition with a martial law declaration, if possible.
The result of all these events this past month is that the security situation in the Philippines looks "challenging" and BSSG will continue to monitor it. If you would like to receive email updates on the security situation in the Philippines from BSSG personnel on-the-ground there, please contact us. |
|
August 2007
This Months Featured Article
Workplace Violence
|
Workplace violence continues to be one of the most significant threats in the business world. It doesn't seem to matter what the business is or where it is located, there can be a threat of violence associated with it.
We have done close to 60 water/wastewater risk assessments and we always tried to emphasize that workplace violence was a potential security issue. Usually management did not want to address that issue and felt it was an "unlikely" occurrence. But back on April 26, 2007, the manager of a pumping station, who was in the process of getting a divorce, shot and wounded his estranged wife and killed his wife's supervisor at the Lode Street Wastewater Facility in Santa Cruz, California. He then turned the gun on himself and took his own life. So much for "unlikely."
According to police, some co-workers said the shooting as the result of a love triangle among the dead victims. Other sources said there was no romantic relationship between the boss and the female. Rather, he was trying to act as an intermediary between the couple. Regardless, there were 40 people working at the Lode Street plant, which processes sewage and is operated by the Santa Cruz County Sanitation District. There is little doubt that some employees knew there was potential for trouble there but apparently no one said anything or management failed to take appropriate measures to deal with the situation. The results were tragic.
A month earlier, in Signal Hill, California, just south of Los Angeles, a recently terminated employee shot and critically wounded three people at Kenyon Press printing plant before killing himself when a police SWAT team entered the building. The shooter was a 60 year-old employee and the victims, all men, were all in their 50's. Kenyon Press, which makes custom designed menus, has customer service personnel, copywriters, designers, illustrators, proofreaders, prepress, press and bindery/manufacturing workers. Its clientele includes Las Vegas casinos and hotel chains, according to its Web site.
On April 9, 2007, two people were killed and one person was critically injured when a disgruntled former employee, who had recently been terminated, opened fire in a Detroit, Michigan suburb office building. The ex-employee returned to his former place of employment with a 12-gauge shotgun and opened fire on some individuals he felt were responsible. Police caught the man after a high-speed car chase when he attempted to get away.
There were also recent deadly shootings in Atlanta's Cable News Network Center and at University of Washington's Seattle campus. Many are all too familiar with the bloodiest workplace violence incident that occurred at Virginia Tech University.
Officers found University of Washington researcher, Rebecca Griego, on the floor where she had been shot multiple times. Her killer, who was her former boyfriend, was slumped behind a desk with a single, apparently self-inflicted gunshot to the head.
Police said Arthur Mann, the victim's ex-boyfriend, shot her to death near the CNN Center in Atlanta. Witnesses later reported that they had seen a man drag the victim by the hair through the atrium at CNN Center shortly before she was shot. Security officers cornered Mann and shot him in the face, while employees at the adjacent CNN.com newsroom watched in horror.
What can we learn from these tragic incidents? Is there something that can help prevent shootings and deaths in the future? How can someone avoid being a victim of workplace violence?
First, it is important that companies have an education and awareness program, and a policy that deals with workplace violence. That policy should put part of the responsibility for office safety with the workers themselves. They must be educated on what to be looking for and employees should then be aware, vigilant and have a means to communicate potential problems.
The number one thing experts recommend is that all employees be aware of their surroundings, be watching for suspicious behavior (that they have received training on looking for) and be aware of potential escape routes. This is what some experts call "situational awareness." Dangerous people in public workspaces often exhibit warning signs including telltale body movements that appear to indicate someone might have a weapon and they typically take quick, jerking actions and shout and grab or push. These are all signals of potentially violent trouble.
A gunman killed five people and injured several others in February at the Trolley Square shopping mall in Salt Lake City, Utah, before off-duty policeman shot and killed him. The killer, Sulejmen Talovic, was hiding inside a storefront and shooting at anyone who was in the area. After the fact interviews determined he was exhibiting strange and suspicious behavior before he opened fire but no one called police or security when the incident could have potentially been prevented. Instead they waited until gunfire erupted and some people were already dead.
Additionally, it is important that there be some visible and credible security in the workplace. Those resorting to violence have reported they knew the environment and had determined the security was ineffective so they could get away with what they wanted to do at that location.
So, the first goal is prevention but what do you do after prevention has failed and an individual has opened fire in the workplace? Security experts noted that the top priority in such an incident is to get away. Run and get out of the area. Avoid just hitting the ground because a moving target is harder to hit. Once you are out of the immediate line of fire, call police. Experts noted that in past tragedies when victims were killed after taking cover on the ground and under furniture. This included the recent Virginia Tech shootings and the 1999 attack at Colorado's Columbine High School. The gunmen just walked around shooting people who remained in place.
Although the likelihood of experiencing workplace violence are minimal, the potential consequences can be catastrophic and this means a small business owner or the head of a company/office should take the initiative to be prepared for the potential that workplace violence can occur. The due diligence provided by a good, all-hazards risk assessment can go a long way to protecting the lives and the continuity of the business.
We have all read about the postal clerk who snaps, the middle-aged, laid-off worked who returns with a vengeance, the upset customer who seeks to get his revenge, and the man upset with his ex-wife and enters her workplace with violence on his mind. No problem for you though because this only happens to the other guy, right?
In case you are willing to think the unthinkable and be prepared to protect yourself and your workforce, what can you do? Experts say:
-
Build a response plan and a response team
-
Know the employment and violence/trespassing laws
-
Have everyone watching for, and reporting, signs of potential workplace violence
-
Move to defuse a simmering in-house crisis
-
Remove the source of potential trouble, within the limits of the labor laws
-
If terminating an employee, isolate the individual in a neutral, sanitzed location for personal meetings
-
Escort the individual out of the office but remain respectful
-
Stay vigilant
-
Hire security, even temporarily, if you do not have a security element already working for your company; if you do already have security, make sure they are aware of the situation and take appropriate special measures
The small business cannot realistically handle act as if they had limitless resources to throw at the problem. But some basic countermeasures can go a long way and none of these are overly costly or burdensome:
-
Know and watch for the signs. Know your employees - that means inter-employee relationships, significant personal issues that are underway(divorces, visitation battles, questionable economic flags), the processes and attitudes that are evident when an employee needs to be dismissed.
-
Appropriate physical security measures should be deployed - cameras, locks, lighting, money handling, building/office design can all help protect people in times of emergency. An armed, trained security guard or plain clothes security officer can also be a big plus if they know how to handle workplace violence prevention duties.
-
Have emergency response procedures in place - making sure employees understand and have rehearsed them with practice drills.
All the security in the world may not be able to stop someone bent on violence. However, good due diligence and reasonable security measures may be able to diffuse many issues, create a reasonably secure workplace and reduce the risk of physical violence in your office. If you are concerned about workplace violence, contact BSSG to get help. |
|
CAPP Comprehensive Asset Protection Program

COPPER/METAL THEFT IN THE NEWS
Apparently the Tampa Tribune has determined there is a problem with copper and other high value metal theft in the Gulf Coast area of Florida. During the month of July, 2007 we counted three major articles on the subject in the Tribune. In contrast, the Analysis Brief has been covering this important subject for many months.
Unfortunately, the Tribune, like many of the victim companies, have missed the critically important fact that there is something that can be done to reduce the thefts.
On July 8, the Tribune ran an Associated Press story about the price of world copper and how it is impacting multiple countries but the story noted copper coils and wiring had gone missing from homes, schools and construction sites in the Tampa Bay area too.
On July 12, the Tribune ran a story saying "Copper's Costing Us." It noted that schools' air conditioners were stripped, railroad crossing barriers were rendered useless, construction sites and warehouses were emptied of wiring and tubing. The story also noted that the problem involved more than copper. It included aluminum, platinum, rhodium, palladium and other valuable metals. According to the article (quoting a sheriff's deputy), these metals are popular items to steal because they are "...difficult to track."
On July 20, the Tribune reported that police had targeted scrap yard businesses that purchase stolen copper. According to that article, police said scrap yards were taking the items and crushing them to make it "...difficult to get evidence."
It would seem to us that one of the most important things that could come out of all these past problems is an approach to deal with the tracking issue and the difficulty of getting evidence. It is implied that if that were possible, the problem would lessen. As we have repeatedly noted in our past discussion of the problem, which was again highlighted in these articles, the biggest issue seems to be the ability to positively identify the owner of copper wire and valuable metals when they have been stripped of shielding, markings and are crushed or burned.
For exactly that reason, BSSG developed its Comprehensive Asset Protection Program (CAPP) which is designed to help businesses protect a full range of assets, including copper wire and other valuable metals, whether they are lost to theft or natural disaster. The objective of the program is to positively establish ownership and allow for recovery of stolen property nationwide.
The CAPP approach is especially unique because it is the first use of laboratory developed scents invented by a Florida chemist specifically for use, in conjunction with, trained dogs to detect the scents on stolen property. The first scent, know as "Calidus" (Latin for "hot" - or stolen in street jargon) allows trained dogs and handlers to screen large volumes of property and will "alert" only on the property that has the scent and, thus, belongs to the company. The dog can be used at personnel and vehicle gates, in warehouses, in salvage yards, chop shops, etc. to screen large quantities of materials. When the dog identifies the property as belonging to a company, it will specifically alert on particular parts of the property which also contain covert, laser-etched "DNA" microdots, smaller than a grain of sand. These microdots, applied with appropriate adhesives that vary depending on the temperature and moisture they will have to weather, provide yet another, redundant and overlapping means of positively identifying property.
The covert marking program is only one part of a comprehensive approach that also includes hardening the target with quality locks and appropriate integrated security measures such as a tip hotline, a neighborhood watch program integrated with rewards, warning signage and employee, public and law enforcement education and awareness. As information is reported from companies, tips/informants and police, it will be analyzed and the resulting actionable intelligence will enable a sensible, cost-effective deployment of covert surveillance teams, mobile covert cameras and even sting operations.
If you are truly interested in lessening the theft problem for your assets, contact BSSG about its CAPP. Yes...We will send yet another notice to the Tampa Tribune
in hope that eventually someone there will understand the problems they alluded to have been addressed and there is help for those who truly want it.
|
 |
Chemical Corner |
LIQUID CHLORIDE EXPLODES IN COLORADO
On July 20, 2007, an explosion ripped through the interior of the Carter Lake Filter Plant in Larimer County, Colorado. Two workers were hospitalized for chemical inhalation because of the explosion. According to authorities the explosion occurred about 7:15 a.m. when a delivery truck was off-loading liquid chloride into tanks. Suddenly there was an explosion. There may have been a chemical reaction involved or a spark, perhaps from static electricity, but the end result was an explosion that damaged the plant interior and blew out doors and windows.
Two other workers and three firefighters were decontaminated for exposure to poly-aluminum chloride a hazardous liquid chlorine compound
The explosion created a small gas cloud surrounding the building, but air-quality monitoring by emergency responders indicated there was no serious hazard. As a result of concerns, however, County Road 8E and Schofield were closed as well as County Road 27E near the lake's South Shore Campground.
The plant, which was located at 7200 County Road 8E, serves about 7,400 water customers in Larimer, Weld and Boulder counties. The explosion damaged a relatively new filtration plant. Authorities said the customers can be served by rerouting water from another treatment facility. Interestingly, there were two excavation blasts of explosives, planned for the lake on July 20. The first blast occurred about the time of the incident and the second blast was postponed and, when it occurred around noon, it was carefully monitored by the Larimer County bomb squad. Fire agencies initially responded from Longmont, Loveland and Fort Collins and Berthoud. Other agencies, including some from Wyoming, arrived later.
Many have touted liquid chloride as the safe alternative to chlorine gas. It is safer than chlorine gas in many respects, but it is clear that there are still risks involved in any chlorine compound and some lessons learned should emerge from this incident.
See the Incident Management article for more details on the emergency response to this incident. |
|
Incident Management Team Room |

THE INSIDE STORY ON ICS USAGE IN A CHLORINE INCIDENT
On July 20, 2007, the Berthoud Colorado Fire Protection District experienced the largest, major incident in the history of all of the fire service elements that have borne the name Berthoud, going back to 1888. On that date, a large chlorine related explosion ripped through the Carter Lake Filter Plant. The incident was the third incident to bring statewide and national attention to the 100-square mile fire district in as many years.
Fortunately, the doctrines of the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and Incident Command System (ICS) have been preached by the district leadership since 2002. In this latest event, the use of the Incident Command System and the receipt of high dollar equipment in both the areas of HAZMAT and command vehicles, paid major dividends.
The incident command system for this event took on the following unique aspects:
- The use of the Deputy Incident Commander position, as opposed to going to Unified approach, worked very well.
- The concept of Branch Tactical Planning was utilized and was reflected in the construction of the incident action plans, contents, and size.
- There was no Operations Section Chief assigned due to the effectiveness of the Deputy Incident Commander, Hazmat Group Supervisor, the check-in recording and resource tracking functions at the command post.
- The entire event was managed at the local level with key support from the area counties and the State EOC.
- The first operational period was 24-hours.
- Having a certified, all hazard, Type III Planning Section Chief on scene for the duration of the incident helped the command staff and the Incident Commanders significantly in achieving the incident objectives within less than 36 hours.
In all, 136 responders performed 20 level A HAZMAT entries in a 34-hour period. There were a total of 38 agencies involved, which included resources from the State of Wyoming and four Federal agencies. In this incident the Incident Command System proved that it is the ultimate management tool... if it is in the hands of leaders who know how to use it.
More Information
|
|
The World of Industrial Espionage |

CHINESE INDUSTRIAL ESPIONAGE MAKES NEWS
In May and June of this year, and multiple times in 2006, the Analysis Brief has carried articles about Industrial Espionage being carried out by the People's Republic of China (PRC). As if often the case, a month or two, or even a year or two later in some cases, you can read about it in the major media. This may be yet another case of "We Told You So First."
With the conclusion of several court cases, this past month, both CNN (on July 4) and USA Today (on July 22) carried news reports of the Industrial Espionage case involving Chi Mak, a Chinese-born engineer. In this case, the information in question also had a national defense related twist.
The Analysis Brief highlighted the case several months ago but several interesting things emerged from documents revealed in court that might have relevance to companies concerned about protecting their trade secrets from Chinese intelligence, or any industrial spy, for that matter. First, the government was unable to prosecute Mak for espionage related to government secrets because the documents being used by the engineers were not properly marked even though repeated witnesses said they knew the information was classified in terms of the Department of Defense definitions for various classifications (which are mainly linked to the amount of damage that can be done by loss of the information).
There is a lesson here for the careless company that lets its staff and engineers use working documents and not worry about protective caveats. If you are not properly marking ALL your sensitive trade secrets, you risk them being compromised and lost without any recourse. The 1996 Economic Espionage Act makes it clear that one of the elements of proof for the crime of espionage will be clear protective measures and that includes marking documents, disks or information that is a trade secret in a manner that sets it apart from other, less sensitive information.
Secondly, it was interesting that the jury did not "buy" Mak's defense that none of the information was really that sensitive (his attorney said Mak gave "absolutely nothing" to the PRC because the material Mak had was openly presented at public conferences). The jury must have determined that Mak's actions did not match his claim since he had copied the material onto a specially encrypted CD-ROM and then hid the disk amongst Chinese folk songs and homework a nephew had completed. The jury seemed to feel that is not how people treat open source information that has been publicly released.
Another interesting thing to emerge from the case is the fact that Mak used his entire family, including his son, his wife and his brother to support his operation. All were knowingly involved in the operation. This is also typical of Chinese espionage operations.
Additionally, the Mak family were in contact with the Zhonghsan University Chinese Center for Asian Pacific Studies in Guangzhou. The Guangzhou region is well-known for its links to Chinese military intelligence and the Zhonghsan University program is also known to be affiliated with the People's Liberation Army intelligence services and has a charter to conduct research and gather information related to defense technology.
Then, when the brother communicated with the handler at Zhongshan University, he did not use his true name. Instead he used the cover name "Red Flower in North America." The PLA intelligence services regularly give their agents the names of Chinese flowers.
Finally, the Naval Criminal Investigations Command and Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) found documents and letters that linked the Mak's to a number of other Chinese born individuals employed by high tech aviation companies and defense contractors. The Mak case, then, is undoubtedly just the tip of the iceberg.
In fact, The FBI told USA Today their Chinese Industrial Espionage caseload is up 12 percent since 2001. Companies with sensitive trade secrets should understand the Industrial Espionage threat and take appropriate measures to protect their sensitive information. BSSG has more than 35-years of experience at protecting sensitive information and can help you develop a comprehensive and effective protection approach.
More Information |
 |
International Waters |
North Korea Activities in Asia and Russia
Reports indicate that the North Korean government has become one of the largest criminal syndicates in the world and there are concerns that their increased ties to Islamic terrorist groups could pose an even bigger threat. Through its infamous Bureau 39 and Daesong industries, the North Koreans are allegedly involved in drug trafficking, counterfeit commercial products and cigarettes, as well as counterfeit US currency.
Using a shipping fleet trained to insert covert operatives, and abusing diplomatic immunity, many allege the North Koreans are expanding their illegal operations by carrying drugs, counterfeit currency and explosives in their diplomatic pouches and using their covert operational ships to move drugs, firearms and counterfeit cigarettes in volume .
North Korean ships have been sighted transhipping drugs, counterfeit cigarettes in Japan, Korea and the Philippines. They have even been blamed for selling weapons to radical Islamic terrorists in the Philippines and Indonesia. North Korean criminal activities in Asia are focused in a former Portuguese colony, now a Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China...the gambling mecca of Macau. Macau has been a center for North Korean criminal and intelligence activities for at least 30 years. Macau is their gateway to the rest of the world and Chinese Triads and Russian mafia elements are also well represented in Macau.
The North Korean pharmaceutical companies and state farms supposedly produce the illegal drugs. The government uses the profits to finance health programs in North Korea. Japanese authorities have intercepted more than 3300 pounds of crystal meth on North Korean vessels just in the past year and defectors have claimed they helped cultivate and refine heroin from poppies, using state owned land, personnel and vehicles.
According to our sources, which specialize in intellectual property protection, Taiwan and the Philippines, especially the free trade zone in the former US navy base of Subic Bay, are major transhipment points for up to 41 billion contraband cigarettes produced each year in North Korea. These cigarettes are sold throughout Asia under popular brand names such as Marlboro and Benson & Hedges. In Japan, North Korean cigarettes often carry the Mild Seven brand name.
Finally, the US State Department says that North Korea has been producing counterfeit US currence since at least the early 1990's and in 2006 sources estimated the North Koreans had put more than US$48 million of counterfeit currency into circulation. Often this was done by diplomats working with organized criminal gangs in Macau, elsehwere in China, and with Russian mafia groups that spread the drugs and counterfeit currency throughout Europe.
A big concern is the fear that the North Koreans could use their knowledge of nuclear weapons, their covert shipping methodologies and criminal connections to smuggle weapons of mass destruction into the US, Japan or Europe.
One way or another, it is clear that there are many indications that North Korea poses a broad potential threat to the world and the North Korean government is abusing every privilege and right that it receives from the rest of the world.
During the Cold War, the North Koreans were viewed as some of the most extreme and radical opponents we faced in the intelligence business. Now, it appears that threat has expanded into the private sector, banking sector and international trade. BSSG has the expertise to help companies understand this threat and how to protect themselves. |
July 2007
| Greetings!
Business Stratagem Support Group (BSSG)
This is our seventh edition of the Analysis Brief for 2007. This edition addresses some diverse security issues ranging from theft to Industrial Espionage, from incident management and planning to terrorism. A theme that is emerging is the importance of having a factual basis and expertise when making decisions about a security related issue. For example, the opinion of a diving school owner or a nightclub owner on terrorism should be balanced with someone who actually has expertise in terrorism related to that area. An owner of property recently tried to tell us that he didn't "think" thieves would take the time to scrape off an identification tag or obliterate a serial number. Police who deal with the crime of burglary every day tell quite a different story. Our experience is also quite different . As a result, law enforcement often has problems with establishing ownership of what is obviously stolen property. This is why we designed the Comprehensive Asset Protection Program the way we did. Read more about this new, comprehensive approach to protecting your assets that was initiated by BSSG this month. We are constantly looking for unique and new approaches to keep our foes off balance. We hope this edition will provide some education and awareness and will stimulate discussion of the security challenges we face in the 21st Century within the United States and around the globe....Flexible innovative solutions for fluid threats!
|
CAPP Comprehensive Asset Protection Program
BSSG Introduces Its Comprehensive Asset Protection Program (CAPP) and America's First Theft Detection Dog
You may have seen movies where the Bloodhound dog is baying as it tracks the escaped prisoner. You may have seen the dog at the international arrival area sniffing passengers for forbidden fruit. Or, you may know that dogs are being by the police and military used to detect explosives in bombs or illegal drugs. But what about a dog that can detect stolen property?
That's only one part of a new, comprehensive approach that also includes using covert microdot technology developed in the Cold War spy-versus-spay era, and then employing all of these techniques, and more, in an approach designed to protect a business or individual's valuable assets.
An ARK-9 detection dog and handler screen tools and identify
a group of tools that have the Calidus scent and DNA microdots applied.
BSSG's Comprehensive Asset Protection Program (CAPP) and is the most comprehensive asset protection program available. CAPP is designed to help all types of businesses protect a full range of assets as diverse as gold and copper wire, metals such as aluminum and stainless steel, high value equipment, computers, tools, parts, etc., whether lost to theft or natural disaster. The objective is to be able to establish ownership and recover property nationwide.
The CAPP approach is especially unique because it is the first use of laboratory developed scents invented by a Florida chemist specifically for use, in conjunction with, trained dogs to detect the scents on stolen property. The first scent, know as "Calidus" (Latin for "hot" - or stolen in street jargon) allows trained dogs and handlers to screen large volumes of property and will "alert" only on the property that has the scent and, thus, belongs to the company. The dog can be used at personnel and vehicle gates, in warehouses, in salvage yards, chop shops, etc. to screen large quantities of materials. When the dog identifies the property as belonging to a company, it will specifically alert on particular parts of the property which also contain covert, laser-etched "DNA" microdots, smaller than a grain of sand. These microdots, applied with appropriate adhesives that vary depending on the temperature and moisture they will have to weather, provide yet another, redundant and overlapping means of positively identifying property.
What makes it comprehensive is that the CAPP approach is based on employing a program with multiple components. As with everything BSSG does in the security realm, we believe the approach should start with a risk assessment. The recommended approach typically includes insuring the company has the most effective security policies and procedures possible. The company should have a truly "hardened" target with quality locks and appropriate integrated security measures. It also includes using a tip hotline and neighborhood watch program integrated with rewards, warning signage, as well as employee, public and law enforcement education and awareness. As information is reported from the companies, tips/informants and police, it will be analyzed and the resulting intelligence will enable sensible, cost-effective deployment of covert surveillance teams and covert cameras, even sting operations.
BSSG Asset Recovery K-9 Unit (ARK-9) dogs are trained at a canine training center where dogs have been used for a number of new and exciting roles. It was clear dogs could become a key cog in an asset protection program. Some of the best evidence is cited in a report prepared by the Institute for Biological Detection Systems (IBDS) of Auburn University (Auburn, AL), which explains dogs have the following capabilities:
Sensitivity: Documented limits of olfactory detection for the dog range from tens of parts per billion to 500 parts per trillion.
Discrimination: Dogs are extremely good at discriminating a target vapor from non-target vapors that are also present, even at relatively high concentrations of non-target odors.
Odor signatures: When being trained to detect a substance, dogs learn to alert to one or two of its most abundant vapor compounds.
Multiple odor discriminations: Dogs can easily learn as many as ten odor discriminations.
What BSSG did was put all of those capabilities together in a manner that is designed to help companies deal with the problem of positively identifying their property. No longer do electric companies have to wonder about how they can positively identify copper wire. An all-weather adhesive, covert microdots and a special scent can positively identify the property. Cell phone companies, construction companies, private businesses, museums, railroads, property management companies can all benefit from this comprehensive approach.
In the past, companies have tried marking equipment, when possible, with property labels or have etched their equipment or recorded serial numbers. Thieves countered by removing the labels and obliterating other markings, or even chopping up components and selling them separately. Overt marking is still encouraged but covert marking adds another dimension.
The typical problem with covert marking is to train adequate numbers of law enforcement agencies on the covert systems so they know to contact BSSG to identify the ultimate owner even if the stolen property is moved to another state for fencing or sale, which is a common practice. BSSG is an agent of the company that developed the microdots and they have been training law enforcement on the microdots. BSSG also works with the legitimate salvage yards and pawn shops. The special scent just adds another layer of potential detection.
Companies have been using fences, locks, alarms, guards and Closed Circuit Television systems to try and detect or deter thieves but if they are not used in a comprehensive, integrated manner they can be defeated and we see it every day. BSSG's approach is to integrate all these approaches and then add the covert and overt marking of property as the final layer of protection. The resulting Comprehensive Asset Protection Program (CAPP) is designed to be reasonably priced but highly effective.
If you are interested in protecting your assets and your current approach is not as effective as you would like, talk to BSSG about our CAPP approach. |
|
|
|
Red Team Concept |
|
HOME GROWN UK BOMBERS USE THE RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORIST TARGET LIST
By now everyone is keenly aware that more so-called "home grown terrorists" attempted to use two vehicle borne improvised explosive devices (VBIED's) to bomb at least one night club, perhaps more, in Central London a week ago but the explosive devices apparently malfunctioned and, as a result, many lives were saved. These two VBIED's were followed by an attempted car bombing of the airport in Glasgow, Scotland where, once again, malfunctions and on this occasion, vehicle barriers, thwarted the attack.
These attacks should have demonstrated the flaws in some people's thinking (and we use the term lightly) about terrorists motivated by radical Islamic Salafi-Jihadism. We suspect some will continue to express their "feelings" on the subject but it is time to focus on facts. The theory of some, who commented on the background of "home grown terrorism," in the wake of the 7/7 subway/bus bombings in London, other bombings in Europe, or even those who were involved in alleged terrorist plots in the U.S., is that all of this took place because the young radicals involved were discriminated against and could not find opportunities in a racist Europe/America. Faced with this situation, terrorism was, they say, a natural outcome.
These most recent attacks should shatter that simplistic view. Certainly their isolation in society could be one of the many collateral issues, but in this latest series of attacks the perpetrators of these acts were well thought of, well paid medical doctors. Some may point out these individuals were not pure "home grown" terrorists because they were not long-time residents. But these individuals qualify as home grown in the sense that they were not visitors but were employed residents of the UK who had even been outspoken radicals at Cambridge University and local mosques.
The question is how we can best deal with this problem and protect ourselves.
We commend the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) for a step in the right direction through their pro-active efforts in the wake of these most recent incidents in the United Kingdom. A recent Los Angeles Times article noted that the LAPD was conducting antiterrorism assessments of nightclubs in Los Angeles.
There were, however, some disconcerting issues that the article highlighted. First, the Times noted that "nightclubs" had not appeared on any government lists of possible terrorist targets. They noted that a 2003 list of leading targets, produced by the California attorney general's office, included the Los Angeles International Airport, Disneyland, the Golden Gate Bridge and the ports of Long Beach, Los Angeles, San Diego and Oakland. Where were the nightclubs?
What our government agencies focus on is worth noting but we tend to believe that an even better approach is for businesses to do some research on their own. They should examine what the radical Islamic terrorists say about what they will target using the terrorist's own internal communications. Obviously the terrorists do not openly list specific targets by name but they do give some categories of potential targets. The following is a general compilation of multiple radical Islamic documents that address what the terrorists say warrants targeting for "blasting and destroying" (their words, not ours). That list includes:
- National Infrastructure such as
- Airports
- Seaports
- Nuclear plants
- Government buildings, especially for defense and internal security
- Embassies
- Military bases
- Vital economic centers
- Strategic buildings and skyscrapers
- Radio and television stations
- Places of amusement such as
- Amusement/theme parks
- Zoos
- Places that are deemed "immoral" or are "centers of sin" - these are listed as "free targets" that can be attacked by anyone at any time
- Shopping malls and other symbols of American consumption
- Churches and synagogues (symbols of religion)
- Schools and hospitals
- Sites of "sentimental value" such as the Statue of Liberty
- Large sporting events because of their mass casualty potential
- Groups such as the Masons, Lions or Rotary and similar organizations that push American/Western values and religion
- Anything Jewish
In view of this list should anyone have been surprised that the recent attacks included the Glasgow airport? Should it be any surprise that previous terrorist attacks, or plots, have focused on a school in Breslan, Russia; U.S. embassies in Lebanon, Kenya and Tanzania; the World Trade Center; the Pentagon; the Federal Center in Miami; Ft. Dix in New Jersey? After all, they are all on the target list.
The Times article had an interview with the owner of a nightclub in Hollywood. This individual said he "doubted" that Hollywood clubs posed as much of a risk as other targets. He cited the small window of time (only three or four hours) when there were a lot of people present at the clubs. Therefore, he apparently concluded that no terrorist would target nightclubs in Hollywood. In years of analyzing terrorists, I have never seen a terrorist group deterred because there was only a three or four hour window of opportunity to attack each night.
The Times also interviewed a former doorman who was supposedly opening a new club in Hollywood and who was, according to the newspaper, "skeptical" the neighborhood would be targeted. As near as can be determined from the article, his skepticism was based on the fact that clubs in the area were relatively small with no more than 600 people. The former doorman was more concerned that enhanced security might cause congestion and adversely impact on business.
Instead of focusing on club owners, with no expertise in terrorism, it might be more relevant to look at the terrorist target lists and examine the terrorist's past practices. This is the dilemma: Using the rationalization of these nightclub owners, none of the nightclubs in London, Madrid and Bali should have been attacked. Yet, they were. The attacks took place within the same time window of opportunity and all were all in clubs with less than 600 customers.
Given the target list, a more relevant question might be: Would radical Muslim extremists view a nightclub in Hollywood as a place that might be "immoral" and/or a "center of sin"? Or would it just be an amusement center? Oops. That would still make it a target, but in two separate target categories.
What about the belief that since many nightclubs only have a few hundred clients no one would bother. If the only terrorists carrying out attacks were the major cells of al Qaeda then that might mean their priority would be elsewhere, for a bigger, more spectacular target. But experience shows that these places are considered "free targets" and the "home grown" terrorists, which are emerging as a major threat, are encouraged to strike such targets at any time. I personally have been in one of the nightclubs in Bali that was bombed, and had a former colleague injured in the terrorist attack there. There were only a few hundred people in the club at the time of the attack. Having a clientele of less than 600 is not a criteria that will cause all terrorist groups to take a nightclub off their target list.
So, the 2003 attorney general's list, albeit dated, is not totally out-of-line but it is hardly a complete list of potential targets for home grown terrorists in California in 2007. Nightclub owners in Hollywood, elsewhere in the United States, and around the world should be considering security measures that can enhance the protection of their clientele.
As society, most people want to feel safe in places we most often frequent. But if we are inconvenienced or delayed in anyway, we seem ready to foreget security and safety. The ex-doorman was right on that count. When the Transportation Security Administration was created, and airport security protocols were created, there was an uproar. It resurfaces from time-to-time, but the truth is that most people have now come to accept airline screening as the way it has to be in order to try and protect themselves from terrorists. That same formula might have to be applied for some other potential targets.
Rather than rely on doormen who worry only about congestion and blow off the terrorist threat, a better approach might be to realistically deal with this potential threat. There are a number of actions that nightclubs, shopping centers and malls, amusement parks, zoos and other businesses should be taking. This might include enhanced physical security measures. It might also include barriers. It most certainly would include education on the threats. The better employees and the public understand the threat, the more likely they will be alert, overcome stereotypes and report truly valid suspicious activities. They will also come to better appreciate why certain security measures are necessary.
BSSG can help businesses to build an effective, efficient but reasonably priced program that truly fit the threats and risks. Regardless, whatever is done should be a management decision based on a credible knowledge of the risk rather than guesses and speculation.
|
 |
Chemical Corner |
Gas Pipeline Security Gets Attention in New York - Is Anyone Else Listening?
In the wake of an alleged plot by four men with radical Islamic terrorist ties to blow-up a fuel pipeline linked to John F Kennedy Airport, some New York lawmakers are pushing for increased security for all pipelines and storage facilities.
The airport incident highlighted some major vulnerabilities. In New York, for example, the Public Service Commission, the state utilities regulator, has only a brief mention about security in its regulations. That comment simply requires that exposed pipelines "be reasonably protected." As a result, security has not been something that garnered much attention. The recent JFK incident has spurred a new look by some in New York.
Lawmakers and some residents of Queens, for example, have been complaining that an exposed natural gas pipeline that KeySpan is constructing over the Grand Central Parkway is vulnerable. It runs across a transit rail bridge above the parkway. After complaints and expressed concerns, KeySpan said the pipeline is safe but, nonetheless, they subsequently announced they are constructing a 10-foot high fence, topped with barbed wire, around the pipeline to "secure the site and prevent intrusion."
Some just proposed legislation calls for regular assessments by the state, and fees and penalties if security improvements are not implemented. Lawmakers have also called for security review of the pipelines owned by Buckeye Partners, the company that ran the pipeline at JFK airport. Buckeye has said that it has reviewed safeguards for more than 5000 miles of pipeline in 18 states and the company spokesmen said that, historically, most of the problems were caused by contractors who accidently dug up the pipeline. Buckeye's concern was that increased security would cost the company more and Buckeye insisted it would pass those costs on to the consumer!
It is the same old, tired pattern. Companies do not want so spend money on security and state regulations are outdated. Legislators and regulators wait until there is an incident in their locale and then they react by proposing what should have been done to prevent the incident in the first place. New York got a wake-up call, fortunately before anyone was killed or injured, and some legislators and residents are trying to push it into a secure posture for pipelines.
New York seems to be alone in trying to be more pro-active on pipeline security but they are, admittedly, reacting to a clearly illustrated threat. Other states could be even more forward thinking and could learn these lessons without waiting for an incident to occur within their borders but so far that is not happening. Hopefully legislators and regulators in more states, the Department of Homeland Security, Environmental Protection Agency and citizens will join to put pressure on companies to enhance security. Hopefully, too, there are a few pro-active companies out there that can see the value of a third-party assessment and will take the initiative to demonstrate a concern for security and safety, and a desire to help shape security guidelines before they are compelled to comply with something that is imposed from without in a knee-jerk reaction to an incident.
BSSG has the expertise necessary to conduct a quality third party risk assessment that includes recommendations on reasonable and effective security measures, if needed.
|
 |
Domestic Desk |
BSSG Calls for Diving School Alert a Month Before the FBI Alert
The June 30, 2007, edition of the Tampa Tribune featured an interview with several Tampa area scuba trainers because of a nationwide alert the FBI had put out about the potential for terrorists taking diver/scuba training as a prelude terrorist acts in the water, much as they had used flight schools to train for the 9/11 attacks.
In fact, once again, the Analysis Brief was ahead of the reporting on the matter, having reiterated the need for diving schools being alert to potential terrorist training in our June edition, released earlier in the month.
As is too often the case with the media, the Tribune decided not to interview counterterrorism experts but, instead, quoted one of the local diving instructors who said, "I'm just not sure a terrorist is going to bother getting a lot of training."
Such quotes are misleading and makes it look like the FBI might just be making up something that is unrealistic. The next thing we know Rosie O'Donnell will be making another appearance on the View just to discuss how this must be another government plot to abuse human rights. The issue should not be what some citizen thinks or feels. Yes, the individual the Tribune interviewed might have diving expertise but he was definitely not an expert on terrorism. In fact, this individual's opinion is amazingly uninformed and that is disconcerting. The important thing to consider is what the historical evidence indicates would be likely activities for Salafi-Jihadist terrorists. If an individual has not studied Islamic fundamentalist movements such as Wahabism and terrorism, has not studied the so-called al Qaeda training manual and al Qaeda Encyclopedia, then that individual is probably not the best source for providing an informed opinion on the terrorist threat in the diving realm, or any other terrorism related realm.
In fact, concern about radical Islamic terrorists using divers or the Swimmer Delivery Vehicles (SDV's) goes back as far as the studies done in the wake of the bombing of the USS Cole, or at least the capture of some al Qaeda affiliated individuals in November of 2002. Documents and debriefings from those incidents indicates that terrorists had openly discussed planting explosives on the hulls of ships, using divers to reach a ship and then climbing aboard on hijack the ship and turn it into a floating bomb, or even using the SDV loaded with explosives as a sort of underwater suicide bomb.
In that same time frame, Israeli counterterrorist experts had noted that it would be extremely difficult for terrorists to pull off some of the plans they have discussed on the web without training and operational experience.
It appears the terrorists understood that or at least listened because intelligence experts subsequently noted that al Qaeda has increased its capabilities in this arena by acquiring sophisticated diving equipment and training operatives in diving techniques. So much for the opinion that terrorists won't go get training.
In reality, there are several specific examples to the contrary. In the Philippines, where BSSG has an office, counterterrorism experts noted, back in 2005, that a member of Abu Sayyaf Group underwent scuba training on the Philippine island of Palwan. One of the most famous incidents related to diver terrorist training deals with allegations, still on-going, that a Tunisian national became a diving instructor in the Safe Dive Club of Eindhoven, Netherlands and began training a number of his colleagues from a radical mosque there. Dutch authorities even labeled the group the "al Qaeda Diving Team" - a label subsequently applied to a group of Islamic "tourists" who were undergoing training at a California diving school before FBI scrutiny apparently disrupted their training.
The fact is that there is substantial evidence that Salafi-Jihadist terrorists have already obtained some diving equipment and training, and have encouraged others to do more of the same. The FBI and Department of Homeland Security have been discussing this issue since 2002 and here are what they say might be relevant indicators, based on a DHS warning in 2003:
Indicators:
The following indicators may point to possible terrorist planning. Alone, each indicator can result from legitimate recreational and commercial activities; however, multiple indicators combined with other information can possibly suggest a terrorist threat or impending attack.
- Requests for specific specialty training, including odd inquiries that are inconsistent with recreational diving.
- Requests to learn advanced skills that can be associated with swimmer attack training, including training with re-breathers, deep diving, conducting "kick counts" or receiving navigation training.
- Rapid progression of diver training and certifications, particularly if the training is routinely attended by the same students.
- Training routinely conducted between the same two or three individuals.
- Training sponsored by groups or agencies not normally associated with diving.
- Training given by instructors who do not advertise and appear to have little means of visible support, especially those with a history of extremist views.
- Training conducted in remote or atypical locations or restricted areas.
- Threats, coercion or attempts to bribe trainers for certification.
Strange, unusual or suspicious attempts to purchase specialized marine equipment may provide indication of pre-operational activity. Other equipment related indicators may include:
- Individual purchases of common gear in excessive quantities.
- Attempts to rent advanced gear without required certifications or attempts to rent gear that is inconsistent with the stated purpose of the diving report.
- Volume purchasing inquiries related to Swimmer Delivery Vehicles (SDV's) and Diver Propulsion Vehicles (DPV's).
- Exclusive purchases of darkened gear or after market painting.
- Attempts to purchase large magnets, large diameter PVC pipe or empty compressed gas cylinders or theft of same.
- Attempts to purchase advanced gear such as re-breathers or other equipment used in mixed gas diving by individuals who appear to lack expertise in the use of the equipment.
Logistical planning for swimmer related terrorist attacks might include:
- Groups of individuals, especially those with no visible means of support, sharing a common address near the water.
- Attempts to take diving equipment, particularly advanced gear, without the required certifications on commercial flights.
- Cash purchases of small boats or personal watercraft from private individuals.
- Invalid or unusual explanations of visitor, employment or student status.
- Employment attempts at diving equipment dealers or rental shops.
Unlike the local diving instructors, BSSG has expertise in international terrorism and in radical Islamic fundamentalist terrorism and we believe the FBI was completely correct in trying to to get diving schools to be alert and report suspicious activities. Perhaps what was lacking is the education and awareness training to put the threat in perspective. If we could thwart a terrorist attack before it occurred, it would all be worthwhile. Our government agencies, news media and citizenry will all have to do a better job before that is likely to occur.
|
|
Incident Management Team Room |
Colorado has System to Certify Type 3 Incident Management Team Members
In 2003, the State of Colorado Resource Mobilization Working Group began developing state standards for individual resources and, specifically, Type 3 Incident Management Teams. The Type 3 Incident Management Team Subcommittee of the Working Group agreed to use the National Park Service task books and guidelines as a template, but made some necessary modifications for the state program. The documents created from this process provide guidance for the establishment of minimum standards for incident personnel using these "All-Risk" task books and standards.
Personnel, who are certified in a National Wildlife Coordinating Group (NWCG) position prior to the implementation of this guideline, may retain that certification and carry it over into the Colorado system. To qualify in any other state positions, the individual must meet the standards identified in the new document. New NWCG position certifications can be used for most Colorado positions with the exception of Command and Operational positions outside of a wild land fire incident.
This initiative is designed to:
- Strategically locate trained teams throughout the state.
- Provide for the interim management of an incident until arrival of Type 1 or Type 2 team.
- Prepare team personnel for all-hazard incidents.
- Deploy management personnel when local jurisdictions are overwhelmed, or when an incident goes on for a prolonged operational period.
- Allow requests for single team resources but not necessarily the entire team.
With the publication of these guidelines, the standards established in this guide are to be met by all participating agencies and organizations that choose to certify individuals and teams within the Colorado system. Individuals who have begun the process of qualifying for a position under NWCG guidelines may continue to use those standards and they will be accepted by the Colorado system. Additionally, any individual who has begun the evaluation process need not take any newly required course(s) for that position. No local agency is required to use these standards or qualifications to manage their own incidents.
For more information on this program please contact Matt Coldwell at the Colorado Division of Fire Safety. Hi email address is: matt.coldwell@cdps.state.co.us
More Information |
|
The World of Industrial Espionage |

INDUSTRIAL ESPIONAGE
High Tech Phones Vulnerable to Industrial Espionage
Several months ago the Analysis Brief noted the level of Industrial Espionage occurring in India, and now we have another example of one of the methods used by spies in India -- namely bugging your cell phone. This discussion of an Industrial Espionage technique relates to the high threat level in India but has business implications beyond India.
While many are touting the latest technologies for mobile communications, not so many are explaining the potential business risks of communicating sensitive information on these more and more convenient and capable devices.
The Mumbai Times carried a story of how a potential "spy" could go through some East European and Russian websites that have special spy ware for sale. After obtaining the spy ware, the spies realized they had a bit of code that, for all practical purposes, made it virtually impossible to detect. Experts noted that the internet is full of advertisements offering to help someone turn an electronic device into a listening post. For example, FlexiSpy, from a company called Vervata, touts spy software for mobile telephones that will enable the buyer to "secretly record every SMS message, view its call history and more..." for under 150 Euros.
The Times article goes into detail on how the one particular software purchased actually works. According to the article, the spy first had to downloaded the software on his phone. Then, then using the IMEI number of the victim's mobile telephone, the spy was able to make the spy software work. [If you are not familiar with IMEI number, it is a unique number, much like a fingerprint or DNA, assigned by the phone manufacturer to each handset. Accessing this number is easy. You can either dial * on the keypad and the number will show up, or you can look under the battery compartment.] The spy entered the target's IMEI number into the software loaded on the spy's handset. Using Bluetooth, the spy now loaded the software on the victim's phone -- and, 'viola' -- the spy can listen to every conversation on the victim's phone, read all text messages and even determine the cell phone's location.
Snooping and hacking are familiar concepts when one thinks of computer vulnerabilities but as phones get smarter and become more like a computer, the same vulnerabilities apply to the mobile telephone/communications device.
According to software security experts, this is the price we pay for smarter telephones. The more intelligent your mobile phone, the more vulnerabilities it comes with. Security is often inversely proportional to easy use and functionality. Now that mobile telephones have become a key to business, it is time for business to understand the Industrial Espionage risks of the latest devices being embraced.
|
 |
International Waters |
Motorcycles Increasingly Used in Crimes in Metro Manila
Crime in Metro Manila remains high despite assertions by the Philippine National Police (PNP) that they have been able to lower crime in the city and have the crime statistics to prove that. According to the PNP, homicides/murder, kidnapping, carjacking, armed robbery and drug abuse, have all waned thus far in 2007. The citizens and victims of crime are not so sure.
However, there is one area where everyone agrees the criminal problem seems to be on the increase. In the past couple of years, the motorcycle has become more and more affordable in the Philippines. More people have motorcycles and, as a result, the motorcycle has become a increasing part of the crime scene in Metro Manila. It is, of course, especially useful to criminals who want to elude the police and is the most effective vehicle used to escape the scene of a crime and get through the heavy traffic that usually clogs the city.
Some recent uses of the motorcycle include the assassination of the Abra province congressman. His assassins used the motorcycle to arrive, shoot him and escape after the assassination. The same thing happened when a German national was shot and killed during a dispute in Manila last month, and a Japanese national who was killed this month after a payment dispute in a nightclub.
When a PNP Colonel was kidnapped and tortured last past week, his supposed assassins blocked his vehicle in Quezon City, using a motorcycle. Fortunately he was able to escape before his assailants could kill him.
Armed robberies and simple " mobile phone snatching" or "bag snatching" are also rampant and thieves like to use a tactic where the motorcycle has a passenger riding on the back and veers up on the sidewalk to make the snatch. The motorcycle is then driven back into the street and provides a fast means of escape. Last year, the relative of Philippine President Gloria Arroyo, a college student in one of the famous schools in Manila, was killed after he tried to resist when his mobile phone was snatched. The killer/thief was riding the motorbike and escaped.
During the recent local and legislative elections, there were multiple grenade throwing incidents in Metro Manila, and in other parts of the country especially in Mindanao. Most of the incidents involved suspects who were riding on a motorcycle and easily escaped.
Because of the increasing and alarming number of crimes related to motorcyclists riding tandem, the Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) has proposed that all motorcycle riders should have their helmets that reflect the motorcycle plate number they are riding on so they can more easily be identified when traveling. Naturally, this is opposed by the Motorcycle Riders Association/Club in the Philippines because they maintain as this approach will only be abused by the police and will lead to more corruption on the part of law enforcers.
Air Conditioned Buses Face Increased Robberies
During the months of May and June of 2007, armed robberies increased on public transportation, especially the air conditioned buses, vans and even jeepneys in the Metro Manila area, especially in Makati City.
Just a few weeks ago, a bus from Makati City was held up by five armed men and their armament included hand grenades. After seizing all the passengers valuables, they got off in Quezon City. A few days later, a Deputy Chief of the PNP was driving a passenger van in Makati, to make some extra money, and he was shot and killed by robbers.
Because of the increase in such incidents, the Makati Mayor has encouraged bus operators that are bound for Makati City to install a mobile security alarm that can signal the PNP when there is a robbery inside the bus and many Filipinos are foregoing air conditioned buses to avoid being a target. One of BSSG's staff in the Philippines was recently on an air conditioned bus where the passengers were robbed and now refuses to take an airconditioned bus.
Extortion and Revolutionary Taxes
Meanwhile, the militant arm of the Communist Party of the Philippines, the New People's Army (NPA) as well as other criminal and terrorist groups, continue to attempt to extort money from businesses throughout the Philippines.
In Mindanao, several Weena Company buses have been bombed this past month and several people killed and injured because the owner has refused to pay protection money. A group affiliated with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front is suspected of carrying out the attacks.
In Manila, Globe Telecom said it continues to suffer from bombings of their various remote cell stations. A Globe Telecom spokesperson said the NPA was behind the bombings and destruction. Several weeks ago, the NPA bombed and destroyed the Globe Telecom Cell Station in Masbate, which was only the latest in a score of attacks. Other cell phone companies, hotels, movie stars, politicians, doctors and dermatologists have all reported the NPA had been demanding a "revolutionary tax" from them to avoid being attacked.
The security situation in the Philippines remains a major concern. BSSG has the expertise and capability to assist you in protecting your resources and personnel in the Philippines. If you want to get regular updates on the security situation in the Philippines, contact BSSG to be added to our special alert list.
|
June 2007
| Greetings!
Business Stratagem Support Group (BSSG)
This is our sixth edition of the Analysis Brief for 2007. This edition addresses a variety of security issues but uses the well-publicized terrorist plot at JFK Airport as a means to illustrate the importance of a comprehensive risk-based approach to preventing or responding to security issues. You will see that BSSG was, once again, ahead of events in predicting the source of some of these problems. We predicted problems from the Caribbean, where radical Islamic fundamentalists have been working hard. We also believe it is only a matter of time before terrorists from groups such as Jemaah Islamiyah, Abu Sayyaf Group, Moro Islamic Liberation Front, etc. in Asia will also emerge to inspire or support home grown terrorists in the USA. It is important that our approach recognize that our enemies, be they terrorists, criminals or industrial spies are constantly adjusting to our countermeasures. We must have the ability to use unique and new approaches to keep our foes off balance. It also, we believe, becomes more evident after each incident, that there is value in a third-party assessment. This provides a new set of eyes that helps overcome the blind spots we all have. That is what you can expect from BSSG...Flexible innovative solutions for fluid threats!
|
|
This Month's Feature Article
|
JFK AIRPORT TERRORIST PLOT
Most readers are well aware that the Joint Terrorism Task Force, and various law enforcement agencies in New York City recently announced they had broken up a plot by radical Islamic fundamentalists to try and blow up a fuel lines/storage tanks on John F. Kennedy (JFK) International Airport.
To listen to some of the mainstream media you would have thought everyone was caught off guard. The author had just flown in and out of JFK airport a week before the announcement so the BSSG staff was interested but none of us were surprised by what was revealed about the plot or the plotters.
Going back to October of 2005, the Analysis Brief had warned that intelligence sources were saying radical Islamic terrorist related groups were recruiting personnel and trying to develop operations in Central America and the Caribbean. Specific problem countries then, and now, include Haiti, the Dominican Republic, Honduras, Guatemala, Guyana, Trinidad, Jamaica and Mexico. Additionally, Hugo Chavez, the extremist president of Venezuala has taken the approach that anything that targets the U.S. is good. As a result, he has developed a close working relationship with Iran and they are exploiting the opportunities he has offered them in Venezuela. His "buddy," Sandanista Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua, and the extremist Bolivian president, have also offered radical Islamic elements free reign, within their respective nations, if the ultimate target is the United States.
The April of 2006 Analysis Brief also analyzed the growing threat emanating from internal, "home grown" terrorists within the United States. At that time we noted these so-called "home grown" terrorists are often immigrants who have gone on to become citizens but have gotten involved in radical Islamic movements within the U.S. and, much like their European counterparts, want to destroy the country they now supposedly call home. The terrorists arrested in Miami last year and those recently arrested for a plot to kill soldiers on Ft. Dix, in New Jersey, are yet other recent examples of the immigrant terrorist who has turned against the United States and its citizens.
The porous borders, which we recently found out, can readily allow someone on the no-fly list to cross into the country, unimpeded, from Canada. And the Mexican border, infamous for allowing millions to enter the U.S. for work, also is known to allow people to enter for other than honorable purposes such as drug smuggling or even terrorism. Better security of those borders is a must if we really want to enhance our national security within the homeland.
Another lesson learned from these incidents is the importance of a good background investigation. If the individual is a worker in key infrastructures, there must be a good, quality background investigation. Individuals who travel to Iran and Pakistan certainly warrant further screening.
It is evident that some aspects of airport security have flaws. In spite of all the complaints, we believe the screening of passengers, while far from perfect, is improved from pre-9/11 days when untrained screeners earned less than a MacDonald's worker. Much credit goes to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) which, unlike the airlines/airports, looks at security of passengers in a broader context than just short-term profit and loss, which was the driver when the private sector ran things. But screening of passengers and their baggage cannot occur at the expense of other airport security measures. The terrorists are constantly evaluating our security and try and identify, and then exploit our vulnerabilities. At airports, like elsewhere, we must be constantly changing and improving our security to include security related to all the services provided on the airport including fuel, food and drink, retail sales, maintenance and air cargo. This is where TSA and local agencies have not done so well. Our security is only as good as our weakest link and some of these areas are "weak links." We need good, quality third party risk assessments, and then take those assessments and work, with the airport authorities, to insure measures are implemented that truly mitigate these risks.
This edition of the Analysis Brief we will address other issues that can be linked to the vulnerabilities identified by the JFK plot. Read about the lack of counter surveillances in the Red Team section and read about the targeting of Petroleum, Oil and Lubricants in the Chemical Corner.
|
|
Red Team Concept |
|
THE IMPORTANCE OF CONDUCTING COUNTERSURVEILLANCES
The terrorist incident at JFK Airport highlighted some of the vulnerabilities and short-comings of security at JFK, and, for that matter, many airports in the United States and internationally. It is now evident that the terrorists began their plot in a very traditional manner: trying to gather intelligence, to include taking pictures and conducting surveillances of, key potential targets on the airport, such as the fuel pipeline and storage tanks.
It is disturbing that terrorist plotters can conduct these surveillances and take photographs without anyone ever spotting and reporting them. The first deficiency that flows from this lack of detection is that airport employees were are not properly trained on how to detect suspicious behavior and on the means for reporting that behavior (education and awareness training and anonymous reporting). The second deficiency that emerges is the fact that airport security is not conducting effective countersurveillances that focus on detecting anyone that appears to be casing or surveilling airport infrastructure (what we call Red Team countersurveillances).
One thing we know from terrorist training manuals and our experience from real incidents is that terrorists conductsurveillances as a part of intelligence gathering to support planning their attacks. We know the 9/11 terrorists conducted surveillances and dry runs. We know that the terrorists who were casing Citigroup, the New York Stock Exchange, Prudential headquarters and the World Bank took more than 500 pictures and conducted hours of surveillance as they wrote up their targeting reports. The terrorist surveillance teams, for example, sat for hours at a Starbucks, adjacent to the Prudential headquarters, and took pictures and made maps and drawings. They also took pictures of security posts and security cameras. No one ever reported someone taking suspicious pictures and, obviously, there were no Red Team countersurveillance teams specifically looking for such behaviors.
Recently, the author talked with individuals who had walked the perimeter fence of the Tampa International Airport, right up to where the fuel line runs near the fence line, and were never approached by police or security elements. The same occurred at the edge of the runway in the Denver International Airport.
We can learn something of how terrorists think from the terrorist's own notes recovered when authorities carried out raids of the terrorist's safe house. Cases the author is personally familiar with include the November 17 Group in Greece, the Red Army Faction in Germany, and al Qaida affiliates looking at the World Bank headquarters in Washington, D.C. From the terrorists own words, and notes, we learn that terrorists usually conduct surveillances. Their notes revealed that when they saw heightened, unpredictable, quality security measures during their surveillance and intelligence gathering, they were inclined to change their targets (that is what we call target deflection). We also know, from their own notes, that they fear a professional counter surveillances will detect them during their intelligence gathering and pre-empt their plans. They are always alert to the surveillance and countersurveillance of counter terrorism elements. That tells us that countersurveillances can cause terrorists problems. The lesson is that terrorirsts and criminals can often be deterred by effective, comprehensive counterterrorism measures. It is worth noting that the al Qaeda training manual specifically recommends postponing a terrorist attack if a pre-attack surveillance determines security measures have substantially changed or have been improved since the initial intelligence was gathered and on which the planning was based. The manual goes on to note that operational success is very important and that it may be wise to postpone the operation and re-plan it rather than risk its failure.
A compressive approach to protecting a resource can produce results and a professional Red Team countersurveillance is one of those important components in a comprehensive, pro-active asset protection/anti-terrorism approach.
|
 |
Chemical Corner |
BOMBING FUEL PIPELINES AT JFK AIRPORT
The early planning for this latest terrorist targeting of fuel lines and fuel tanks at JFK airport may not have been entirely sound, but we must remember this was at the early stages of a proposed operation. We should not gain any special comfort by knowing that igniting fuel is not necessarily as easy as it sounds. The lesson learned is that it should be very apparent that terrorist targeting of these key infrastructures is going to occur and that the terrorists are looking for targets which have the lowest levels of effective security protection. This is an important lesson for the United States to learn if it is to effectively protect itself from terrorism or even other threats.
The military targeting community has known, for a long time, the principles that al Qaida and affiliates are using. In fact, their approach is very similar to the U.S. military targeting approach except that the U.S. military actually tries to avoid targeting innocent civilians and collateral damage. When conducting targeting for the U.S. Department of Defense, the author learned that assets connected to Petroleum, Oil and Lubricants - or 'POL' as it is known to targeters - were a high priority. The rule was to identify and promptly target POL assets in order to assist in disrupting enemy operations. Fuel is an essential item in any military operation or any Homeland Security approach. Fuel is necessary for our Air Force aircraft, our Army tanks and Humvees, and for our naval ships to be able to operate in home waters and the Persian Gulf. It was the need for refueling that put the USS Cole in the terrorist crosshairs in Yemen. Even hurricane prompted emergency evacuations depend on a supply of fuel for the vehicles carrying the evacuees which is why the state of Florida requires gas stations along emergency evacuation routes to have back-up generators so they can continue to operate in a crisis and help get people out of the danger area.
This means that fuel depots, refineries, pipelines and storage tanks are all potential targets of our enemies, to include the radical Islamic terrorist. You can bet that the fuel assets at JFK Airport are not the only POL related assets that terrorists are targeting. Since the United States imports so much of its oil and fuel, it is also important to add port security concerns to fuel and pipeline security concerns.
BSSG, with offices in Florida and the Philippines, is especially aware of the vulnerability of our ports. The United States intelligence/law enforcement community missed picking up on the pseudo pilots who were training in the United States so they could fly airliners into targets. We pose a question: Are we missing the Middle Eastern males who are now training in scuba diving and who may be undergoing the training so they can target our ports including Liquid Propane Gas tank ships, pipelines and storage tanks in the ports? We hope the intelligence community and law enforcement are better prepared these days and are taking pro-active measures to identify potential problems ahead of time.
Right after 9/11, sources in Nebraska contacted the director of BSSG to say that some Middle Eastern looking individuals had come into the local gas company office to try and obtain the plans for the location of the natural gas pipelines in the region. In the past, of course, the major threat to gas lines was an accidental rupture when someone dug in the wrong place. For that issue, it was smart to let people know where the lines were buried. It should be apparent, that threat has changed and we have to think differently. Hopefully the response by the gas company employees and law enforcement would be better and faster now after the JFK plot but POL related products will be targeted.
It is important to know your enemy and how the enemy thinks and use that knowledge and expertise in conducting a threat assessment. BSSG spends considerable time studying the terrorist training manuals and trying to think like they think. That's an important part of an effective threat assessment and is not something that just anyone can do well. If you want a thorough and professional risk assessment, that includes a good threat assessment, contact BSSG. If you need training on radical Islamic terrorist targeting, contact BSSG.
|
|
Incident Management Team Room |
Institutionalization of ICS in Colorado
With a little over 20 months under the belt with regard to the new all hazard curriculum of the Incident Command System (ICS), it is apparent that many of the woes experienced by the wildfire community 30 years ago are starting all over again. The transition from compliance standards to performance standards is always a difficult one. Colorado has become a leader in the National Incident Management Systems (NIMS), in many ways, and the pressure is greater in Colorado to make this transition to performance.
The announcement that the Democratic National Convention coming to Denver in 2008 has created an interesting dynamic. By 2008, unlike in 2004, the state will have had about five years of doing NIMS/ICS training. And, unlike some of the other "National Security Special Event" (NSSE) locations, (Washington D.C. and the inauguration of the President or the Super Bowl that is handled by a couple of NFL cities on a fairly regular basis) Denver's last experience with the DNC was more than a century ago, in 1888. It's safe to say that the security plan for that event will not be of much help. Sure Denver has hosted the Pope, it has hosted the Summit of the Eight Conference and a National Basketball Association All Star game, but this time we are talking about an official, full-scale NSSE controlled by a Federal level agency, as directed by the Department of Homeland Security. There is an implied expectation that all those Homeland Security dollars invested on backfill and overtime to instruct ICS and other Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) related courses will now pay off. The return on investment test will be in the late summer of 2008.
Will Denver be ready? Only if there is a true and complete institutionalization of the Incident Command System, across jurisdictions and disciplines. It is understandable that highly traditional first responder organizations have the most difficulty coping with the change. Dealing with change is always difficult. However, the only barometer that really counts in the ICS game is, how many of your citizens or responders were hurt or killed after leadership begins to a make Incident Management decisions. That is always a difficult issue to deal with. An equally difficult and seldom posed question is- What is the acceptable number of citizens that can be hurt or killed just so a traditional first responder organization can be maintained in an era of change? Is it 10, or 50, or no more than 100? I'm sure fire and police chiefs, mayors and city council members all over the country would say the acceptable number is zero. Yet, there is a reluctance to change to a proven, mandated and paid for system (thank you DHS) like the Incident Command System because there are a lot of egos out there and everyone seems to think their turf is the most important thing to protect.
For the Mile High City the clock is ticking to the big event and every day that goes by without real and true institutionalization of ICS brings the first responder community in and around Denver, Colorado a day closer to the world spot light, the microscope of DHS and the scrutiny of the national media.
|
|
The World of Industrial Espionage |

Time to Re-Institute the Tempest Program?
During the Cold War, the United States was very concerned about the ability of its adversaries to gather intelligence by reading what was being typed on computers. It was determined that computers emitted a signal that could be captured and used to reconstruct key strokes. There were other emanations as well.
The counter this technical interception, the United States and its allies adopted a Tempest program to shield and otherwise protect computer systems that were processing the most sensitive classified information. Business and industry also had to consider how to protect themselves. But, in the wake of the Cold War, interest in protecting computer systems from reading key strokes has diminished.
In the 21st Century, Industrial Espionage is a major threat to businesses. Estimates are that Industrial Espionage costs businesses between US$150-300 billion as companies and nations spy on businesses and steal their trade secrets to gain competitive advantages.
Today's computer systems are very different from those used during the Cold War but old spies never die, they just change their game.
Industrial Espionage practitioners in Israel and Germany are now offering a relatively low-cost device that can once again capture the key strokes by reading the emanations. The difference is that now the emanations come from wireless keyboards and from the cable between a computer and a flat screen monitor. Sitting a hundred or two hundred meters away, business spies can read everything being typed on a company's computers.
It may be time for a new Tempest program for business.
This latest development is just one more indication that Industrial Espionage continues to pose a major threat to businesses and it is important for businesses to have a comprehensive Counter Industrial Espionage program that matches their risks. For large or small businesses, domestic or foreign locations, BSSG has experience in helping you develop an appropriate Counter Industrial Espionage program. If you have questions about your industry and want to know how Industrial Espionage can affect you, get in touch with us.
Industrial Espionage Follow-Up
Last month, the Analysis Brief featured an article about the considerable Industrial Espionage threat coming from the People's Republic of China (PRC). At the time we noted that the Industrial Espionage threat involves a number of countries and businesses. The U.S. government says Industrial Espionage against the U.S. involves at least 104 countries. This month we have yet another example involving the PRC.
The U.S. Attorney's Office in San Francisco filed a 36-count indictment in the U.S. District Court for Northern California several months ago. The indictment accused MENG Xiaodong Sheldon of stealing military related trade secrets from Quantum3D, in Silicon Valley, San Jose, California. According to investigators, the defendant tried to sell sophisticated high-end visual simulation training software for flight simulators to the Air Force of People's Republic of China, as well as the Malaysian Air Force, and the Royal Thai Air Force.
MENG, at one time, was an employee of Quantum3D. Allegedly, he subsequently stole the trade secrets from Quantum3D and tried to sell them. Potential customers were in China, Malaysia and Thailand. That technology is covered by the U.S. Economic Espionage Act (EEA) of 1996, which prohibits its sale abroad without an export license and there were undoubtedly other aspects of the EEA that are being addressed.
MENG was released on a $500,000 bond and was the target of a two-year investigation involving the U.S. Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Department of Homeland Security.
This is just one more example of the substantial threat companies face from individuals who may have legitimate access to trade secrets but are willing to conduct espionage for or on behalf of others. BSSG has considerable expertise in developing a comprehensive Counter Industrial Espionage program that includes a risk assessment, policies and procedures, education and awareness, a reporting and analysis approach, enhanced physical security measures and special technologies, including IT security measures.
|
 |
International Waters |
Philippines Continues to be a Kidnap/Ransom Center
More and more kidnapping for ransom incidents have emerged during the past month in the Philippines. Here are just a few examples:
On May 31, 2007, two individuals of the "Laguna Clan," July Peneverde and Rolando Alarma , were arrested in Barangay Liabac, Real town, Quezon City. The two were among the seven members of the so-called "Lagalag or Laguna Gang" who managed to flee after a kidnap victim, Gina Brosas, was rescued during a botched payoff in Nagcarlan town earlier in the day. The suspected gang leader, Jacinto Peneverde and an associate, Rolando Lubi, were killed during a shootout with Philippine National Police (PNP). The Lagalag or Laguna Gang were a kidnap for ransom gang that operated in the Metro Manila area and had become a high priority for police.
On June 1, 2007, several Indian-Filipino businessmen complained that they had faced kidnapping and extortion from a variety of law enforcement personnel, including those from the Criminal Investigations Command. The business-men wanted to remain anonymous out of fear but said they could not find anyone in the law enforcement community or local government that could be trusted and were not involved in the kidnapping business in some way or another.
On June 3, 2007, a joint team made up of members of the PNP, Armed Forces of the Philippines, local government officials and members of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) managed to rescue a German businessman, his Filipino American wife and two Filipino friends. They were all abducted by armed men in Pikit, North Cotabato on May 31. According to authorities, in spite of travel warnings, the German National went to the Pikit area to buy raw materials for a business he runs in Parang, Shariff Kabunsuan. The group initially went to Davao City, then they went to Kabacan, North Cotabato where they were supposed to meet a local guide identified only as "Ed." Near the Pikit area, a band of armed men blocked their vehicle and took the German National, his wife and the two others into a near by forest area. The kidnappers later abandoned the victim's van in Barangay Batolawan in Pikit. A military team recovered the vehicle. The victims said they were not harmed and no ransom was paid to the kidnappers. The gunmen, however, took their cellular phones. PNP officers said the guide, known only as "Ed" was a prime suspect and probably set the group up.
On June 3, 2007, a Chinese-Filipino family alleged that members of the Philippine National Police (PNP), who initially tried to claim they were immigration agents, supposedly kidnapped three members of the family in Sta. Cruz, Laguna. The family members say they were released after they agreed to pay P100,000 ransom to the PNP officers.
These examples highlight the kidnap-for-ransom/extortion (KRE) issues frequently faced in the Philippines. Kidnapping/ransom/extortion activities appear to be on the increase again in the Philippines and have expanded beyond just the Chinese element of the Filipino-Asian community. It now includes the Koreans, Japanese and Indian business people and even some Americans. Part of this is because the Asian community has made itself the ideal victim. They do not file any complaints and they pay the ransom. No small wonder that kidnapping for ransom within the Asian community in the Philippines is on the rise. The lesson here is if you adopt the Ostrich's head-in-the-sand approach, you will pay the price.
It is important for businesses operating in the Philippines to understand the KRE threat and prepare their personnel for how they want them to deal with the issues. Personnel should also know that some aspects of the threat involve the police/local authorities (e.g. the local mayor) and it is important to have honest, credible security personnel who know the truly honest police officers and can properly liaise with police without raising the risks. Additionally, when you go out and hire a local contact or guide, or meet a female suitor who invited the individual out to meet her family in the provinces, those individuals might be conspiring with police and local authorities to extort money. Your security measures should take that into account.
Finally, security providers should be trained in escape and evasive driving (at least two of the incidents described above could have been prevented with a security driver) and with security consulting skills that mean you are exceptionally careful when going to scheduled appointments or activities or establish a travel pattern. It is important to continue to monitor the threat situation in the Philippines and coordinate travel with security experts. If you want that kind of high quality and effective support in the Philippines, contact BSSG.
|
 |
Domestic Desk |
HYDRO ASSESSMENTS
Water or "hydro" risk assessments are an important part of protecting our infrastructure from a variety of threats, including terrorism.
BSSG staff has been involved in conducting assessments for more than 60 water systems around the world. We recently saw an article that openly wondered if our water systems were more secure after "spending millions of dollars to build security fences, install tougher locks, hire armed guards and foil intrusion by computer hackers..." They were, of course, referring to the mandatory assessments required by the Environmental Protection Agency several years ago.
The reason, the article claimed, we were not more secure is because of numerous incidents where some teenagers and other individuals around the country have been able to successfully break into sites that are part of community water systems. One of the highlighted features of the article was based on the fact that some teenagers in a Massachusetts town broke into the water tower and caused the town to flush and backwash the tank they broke into, issue a do-not-drink order and shut down the system for a few days until it was determined that the incident was a bad judgment teen-aged prank. The city assumed the worst to protect its citizens. The implication of the article was that if some teenagers could break into the water tower, what were our chances against terrorists.
Much like those who say our airport security has not improved, BSSG believes that security is improved at most water facilities and that is good. The problem is that most water entities have a ways to go before they can feel more comfortable about the effectiveness of their security. If Blackstone, Massachusetts did not have a detection and response capability that allowed them to detect the break-in and catch these individuals, shame on them. They should have had a better team conduct their risk assessment or they should have implemented more of the recommendations. Rather than wring our hands, these incidents should be an indication that more communities need to do more to secure their water related facilities.
But, overall, there is no question that many water systems are more secure than they were before 9/11. Are they secure against any and all threats? Probably not. Does this mean the enhanced security measures are not of value? No. The logic breaks down here. No security is perfect but it is foolish to say either we have perfect security or we just forget about security.
This is one of the problems with the article. It goes on to note that drinking water is delivered through "such an extensive array of natural watercourses and manmade facilities - from the headwaters to household taps, and then back to rivers and lakes through sewage and stormwater systems - that securing supplies against every intruder will never be practical." The answer, then, the author concludes is to explore ways to detect contaminants to keep people from drinking contaminated water. It talked about using bluegill fish, like coal mine canaries, as well as sophisticated on-line computer assisted monitoring systems. Certainly such systems are worth considering, and the computer assisted systems are getting better and better. But if that is all you do, it assumes the only threat comes from contaminated water.
However, somewhat disjointedly, the article delves into "All-Hazards Response" and more correctly acknowledges that water utilities also have to look at the consequences of what happens if their facility is "taken out" by terrorists or even natural disasters. Having on-line monitoring and/or blue gills will not help you when you no longer have the capability to supply your community with water because the supply has been disrupted. That's yet another issue.
Is one of these more important than the other? Each community has to make that decision for themselves but most would probably say both of those are consequences they want to avoid. But, as the info commercial says -- wait, there's more!
What everyone can agree on is that communities have a ways to go when it comes to looking after the security of their water systems. All communities and their water systems providers need a good, all-hazards threat assessment; a good, third party expert look at their vulnerabilities; and they need to realistically examine the consequences of a variety of likely scenarios. But even that is not enough. They also need a realistic, economical implementation plan for reducing the vulnerabilities and consequences. It should be a three to five year plan and should be reviewed and updated. Unfortunately the EPA did not require a follow-up assessment to see what had been accomplished and what was still needed. So problems remain.
Water security is improved. The fact that those responsible for Blackstone water did not panic but implemented a plan to protect their population against a worst-case scenario and then went about investigating the situation and determining it was a teen-age prank actually demonstrates that we have made progress during the past four or five years. It also shows they still have a ways to go because there was no timely detection and response. The answer is not to throw in the towel. The consequences are potentially too severe to just give up. BSSG is available if water resources want to continue the process of enhancing the security of their water supply and distribution system for their customers.
|
May 2007
|
This Month's Feature Article
|
BSSG Addresses Chlorine Cylinder Threat Long Before DHS
Back in 2003, BSSG's director was conducting an assessment of a water treatment/wastewater treatment facility in Colorado. The water district had reacted to 9/11 by adding contact alarms to many of the doors in their remote facilities. In one facility the door into the room containing pumps was alarmed. But the room next to the pump area, containing four 150-lb cylinders of chlorine gas, had no alarm. The chlorine room had a low security lock, glass window in the door (in theory to allow someone to see if anyone had been overcome by a gas leak), and no alarm. When asked why there was no alarm on the door, the staff explained there actually were two "alarms" in the room and both were linked to their SCADA system. One detected chlorine leaks and sounded an alarm and automatically turned on a ventilation fan. The other was linked to a scale that kept track of the weight of the cylinder that was hooked up to the treatment system. If the tank were suddenly emptied, an alarm would sound showing the tank was empty. Most importantly, they noted, their EPA required Risk Assessment had included a gas propagation projection. That study had shown that even if all of the chlorine gas suddenly leaked, the site was so remote that the gas would be dispersed in the air before it reached any human beings and caused a problem. BSSG's comment was - Okay, but what if a terrorist breaks the glass in the door, unlocks it and removes the three 150-lb cylinders that are not on the scale. The terrorist then puts the cylinders into a pick-up truck, with some conventional explosives, drives to a local shopping mall and detonates the explosives near the intakes for the mall's ventilation system. Would their current approach provide detection prior to the mall attack? The water district was shocked. They had never considered such an event and were focused on an on-site incident. They asked: Would anyone actually do that?
The answer is an unqualified yes. That was four years ago. Now, in mid April of this year, the Department of Homeland Security sent out a warning about a potential terrorist threat based on 150-lb cylinders of chlolrine gas and their use in terrorist attacks in Iraq.
Two months before the Department of Homeland Security warning, BSSG's Analysis Brief had an article that warned about the risk posed by these highly mobile chlorine cylinders used in water/waste water facilities and a number of other industries. The threat was reiterated in last month's Analysis Brief after events in Iraq showed that al Qaeda was continuing to deploy chlorine gas as a weapon. This was still before the Homeland Security warning came out.
The bottom line is that BSSG understands the threats and often is ahead of the federal government or traditional security service providers in addressing fluid, emerging security issues. BSSG has special expertise in conducting chemical, water or wastewater assessments. If you want the most competent and thorough assessment possible, contact BSSG to conduct your risk assessment.
|
|
Incident Management Team Room |
CAMEO- A great tool for the Planning Section in ICS
Incidents involving hazardous materials are often extremely dangerous. The incident can produce vapor clouds that are toxic, they can create violent explosions and fires, or they can spawn other hazards to people or our environment.
One of the dangerous parts of a firefighters' job is to respond to an accidental or intentional release of a hazardous material. To safely mitigate a hazardous materials release, firefighters must be able to access accurate information quickly. The chemical must be identified. As soon as that is accomplished, the responders need to know the resulting health hazards and the appropriate protective clothing they need to wear. Firefighters and responding personnel need to identify all the equipment needed. If the material released is involved with fire, the following questions must be answered: Can water be applied and if water is applied what type of reaction will occur? How large an area will be affected or how many people will be affected? These are just a few of the critical questions that must be quickly answered in the event of a hazardous materials incident. There are thousands of chemicals manufactured, stored and transported in the United States so the amount of information needed is voluminous.
To help firefighters respond to hazardous material releases safely and plan for hazardous material releases, a program titled "Computer - Aided Management of Emergency Operations (CAMEO)" first became available nearly 20 years ago. CAMEO is a system of software applications used to plan for and respond to hazardous chemical releases. The system integrates a chemical database of more than 6,000 chemicals and an air dispersion model, and a mapping capability. Information can be obtained quickly when an accidental or intentional chemical release occurs using this program. Firefighters also have the ability to use this program to track the location of manufactured, stored chemicals, and those being used. They also have a listing of all sensitive locations such as schools, nursing homes, day care centers, hospitals and facilities considered a part of the community's infrastructure that are in the vicinity of the release site. The program has now been expanded to include weapons of mass destruction -- chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and some conventional explosives.
As an operational tool in the situation unit and in the planning section in Interagency Command System (ICS), the CAMEO suite can be applied with a Geographic Information System (GIS) program. GIS is a program that can be used to assist in developing alternate strategies and can also help technical specialists in their analysis and discussions with incident commanders. CAMEO can also easily create reports dealing with the reactivity of chemicals and population estimates that can be shared with the documentation unit in the planning component of the ICS structure. It can also provide important information that can be used to create Incident Action Plans.
The bottom line is that the latest versions of CAMEO can be an invaluable tool for dealing with an all hazards incident. In the right hands, such as those of a trained individual in the planning section, CAMEO can streamline the flow of information necessary to effectively deal with the all hazard implications of an incident.
|
|
The World of Industrial Espionage |

China is Overwhelming U.S.
According to U.S. counterintelligence/
counterespionage experts, the People's Republic of China is the source of the most substantial industrial espionage threat and is conducting industrial espionage with so many resources that it is overwhelming the U.S. government's counterespionage capabilities.
Joel Brenner, the top counterintelligence official in the office of United States Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell, says ``the Chinese are really making a run at us.'' His office said that some 140 foreign intelligence services are trying to spy in the United States. But it noted China was the most aggressive. He described China's activities as most "troublesome" and noted the Chinese spying efforts were "intensifying."
According to Thomas Donohue, president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the U.S.'s largest business organization, U.S. companies -- in fact, companies from any country -- face an "uphill" battle protect sensitive business information, especially if they took any business secrets to China. When talking about taking trade secrets to China, Donohue said: "If you're going to make a huge move towards innovation, well, get ready, in this system, to lose it because somebody's going to steal it."
While agencies such as the FBI and CIA are occupied with radical Islamic terrorism, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and preventing U.S. government secrets from falling into the wrong hands, companies doing business in China are especially vulnerable to losing their trade secrets.
U.S. businesses are paying particular attention to the first industrial espionage civil law suit brought in a Chinese court. The suit was filed by Intel Corp., the world's biggest semiconductor maker. In the lawsuit, Intel alleges that Shenzhen Dongjin Communication Tech Co. Ltd. illegally used Intel's software, which Dongjin had obtained through a third party, for network communication cards in its own products. Shenzhen Dongjin has countersued, accusing Intel of being an illegal monopoly.
But while companies are most vulnerable inside China, industrial espionage is also occurring within the United States. Here are several of the most recent cases involving a Chinese-based industrial espionage:
Between August and December of 2005, a DuPont Company chemist, Gary Min, admitted obtaining information on company products, including materials used in airplane construction, which is supposedly valued at nearly $400 million. The charges say that Min downloaded nearly 22,000 confidential abstracts from DuPont's ectronic library. The documents included information on all DuPont's major product lines as well as emerging technologies. Some of the searches focused on Vespel, a synthetic resin used to coat car, airplane and oil pump parts, and Declar, a plastic material used in the automotive and energy industries and in airplane interiors. Authorities report that when they searched Min's Grove City, Ohio, home, they found computers containing confidential files, garbage bags filled with shredded company documents and the remains of DuPont papers that had been burned in the fireplace.
In Santa Ana, California, engineer Chi Mak, employed by L-3 Communications Holdings Inc., was accused of industrial espionage and stealing national defense information since 1983. Authorities say that Mak, his wife, brother, sister-in-law and nephew were all involved in the spy ring. Court papers say that Mak copied submarine related data from L-3's Power Paragon unit onto compact discs and enlisted other family members to encrypt the data and smuggle it to China. Mak admitted sending information to Chinese intelligence on technology, including the radar systems of Aegis cruisers.
It is important to understand that Industrial Espionage is not just James Bond stuff. It is real and it is costing companies billions of dollars every year. Every company that has trade secrets should have a plan for countering industrial espionage and competitive intelligence. BSSG has assisted some of the smallest and some of the largest companies in the world in developing or enhancing their counter industrial espionage program. Contact us to learn how we can help you to protect your business secrets in China, in the United States or around the world.
|
 |
International Waters |
Philippine Election Violence Continues
Since our last report, the opposition to President Gloria Arroyo has lost ground in the elections and it remains uncertain whether or not the opposition can gain enough seats during the May 14 legislative elections to effectively oust Arroyo. Nonetheless, it is evident that the radical Islamic separatists in the southern islands, especially Mindanao, Jolo and Sulu, have perceived the central government is weakened.
One of the best illustrations of this perception is the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF). The MNLF has decided to withdraw from a negotiations and a tentative peace agreement that goes back to 1995. The MNLF has now joined other groups such as the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), Abu Sayyaf Group and Jemmah Islamiyah in declaring a "jihad," or holy war, and attempting to secede from the Philippines to form an independent Islamic state.
Meanwhile, more than 114 election violence incidents had been documented by the Philippine National Police and the Commission on Elections since the beginning of the year and there are less than two weeks to go until the election (May 14).
BSSG believes that visitors and staff of companies with a presence in the Philippines should avoid public areas, especially government buildings and certainly any campaign related functions such as rallies and speeches. Companies should also closely monitor the election results to determine if there are any disputes or problems that could turn violent or be perceived as a reason to declare martial law.
.
|
|
Red Team Concept |
How does a Red Team test work?
We are often asked how a Red Team test of security would be conducted. The following is an example from one of our past Red Team penetration tests. It will explain what happens and how the results can help you determine the effectiveness of your security systems and approach.
The following Red Team test, took place a couple years ago and used a team of four operational personnel who were given the task of testing the effectiveness of existing security (vulnerability) at a pharmaceutical research and development facility. The team was simply told to do "whatever it took to get inside." The team was given one month to complete the assignment. The team's goals were to test the facility on five different occasions and attempt to gain access to the narcotics storage vault and the laboratory, using whatever entry method worked.
During the first week of the assignment the team set up surveillance and began to keep track of all activity in and out of the facility. During that week the team identified key personnel and several individuals of specific interest. On several occasions the security force for the facility appeared to spot some team members but never challenged them. On one occasion, when one of the team members was sitting on a ridge with a camera taking photos, a security officer drove by but apparently did not see what should have been an obvious surveillance activity.
On the second day, the team had determined that all the key personnel had assigned parking and there was signage with the last name of the individual for each assigned spot. The team also conducted a trash cover and gathered numerous bags of trash. There was a tremendously valuable amount of information in the trash, including a complete company employee roster with home addresses, email addresses, home telephone numbers, and some date-of-birth information. The unit was also able to recover two employee ID cards from the trash.
The amount of information that was gathered the first week paved the road for what was to come. On Tuesday, of the second week, one of the Red Team operatives got a pizza uniform and rigged it with a mini camera and recorder. He went to the entrance saying he had an urgent delivery for one of the techs in the laboratory (based on names recovered from the trash cover). The operative was able to gain access and was even given directions on how to get to where that particular tech was working. Because he was unescorted, the operative was able to video tape almost eighty percent of the faculty's interior areas and spent about a half hour walking around, unchallenged.
The team was able to use the interior shots to train others on where the targets were located and they had also successfully completed their first test. One down and four to go. After debriefing, the main office the team leader asked if the security reports from Tuesday reported any suspicious activity. No big surprise. Nothing had been reported. On the Friday of that same week a different team member gained entry using information gathered. He posed as a telephone repairman. The team was very concerned and believed this would not work. To their surprise it did. The operative was able to gain access to the telephone public exchange room and server room. The operative decided to push it and attempt to gain access to the controlled substance lab. He knocked on the door and said he had to check telephone lines for a problem. He was let into the lab and was allowed to move around freely and unchallenged. Using a fake work order, created based on a form recovered in the trash and a false ID that was generated on an Ink Jet printer, the Red Team member successfully maneuvered his way in and out of restricted areas unchallenged.
After waiting a week, and continuing surveillance on people of interest, the facility the team had decided to attempt an entry using one of the ID's that had been obtained from the trash. The Red Team operative dressed in a white lab coat, similar to the one's worn by company employees, waited in the designated smoking area with the ID in plain site, and then attempted to walk in with a company employee. The company employee did not look closely at the ID and let the Red Team member in. Had he examined the badge, he might have been concerned because the badge being used was for an individual roughly twice the age of the Red Team operative. After walking around for a while, the operative moved over near the controlled substance loading dock. In theory, the procedures for this area were very strict and all deliveries were supervised by an overseeing Federal Agency. When he walked through the area, a security agent did stop the operative. The security agent explained that no one was allowed in this area. The operative was told to leave the area. The operative explained he was new and must have taken a wrong turn. He apologized for the inconvenience and asked the best way to get to the lab. The security agent explained he should go through the bathroom and then used his key pass to open the door for the operative. The operative managed to duck into one of the bathroom stalls and locked the door.
The operative had lost his orientation and was not too sure where he was, so he contacted the team leader and explained what was going on. During the information gathering part of the operation the team knew there was a restricted area near the loading dock but were not to sure of the configuration of that area. The operative explained that there were four doors in the bathroom and one closet with cleaning supplies and other gear, as well as some lockers. All the doors leading in and out of this area had key passes and the operative was essentially locked in. After about two hours of waiting, the operative over heard several company technicians talking about going to lunch. The operative contacted the team leader and explained what he had overheard and explained he would try to make his way out with them at that time. The operative had noticed that there were lockers and the lockers were unlocked. He searched through them and found three pass keys. The operative tested the pass keys on all the doors and found there was one that opened all four doors: to the lab, loading dock, exit and the narcotics vault. The operative also knew there where cameras on the exterior on this side of the facility so he took a hat, the three key passes, and a set of keys.
What could have been a potential disaster turned out to produce some very valuable items and detailed information the team did not have. The team now had all the tools they needed to make the final two penetrations successful. Needless to say, they were again able to use lab coats, badges and keys to get into the most sensitive parts of the facility and none of the employees questioned someone who wore a lab coat, carried a clipboard and appeared to have a functioning badge.
It is worth noting that the team had considered several other scenarios including taking a hostage. While such dangerous activity was not warranted in the test mode, it did reflect how "bad guys" might think in a worst case mode.
During the debriefing the team discovered a report was made for the missing keys and, as a result, the locks where scheduled to be changed later on that month. But it was too late for the company. All of the video cameras were recorded but there was no real-time monitoring so the cameras were of limited value. They did have some pictures of the operatives with hats pulled down obscuring their faces. The security staff were rotated so frequently that only two officers had any local knowledge of personnel and what was an "abnormal" situation. Employees held doors open and were not at all suspicious. They totally relied on "security personnel" to provide security and lacked education and awareness.
It was interesting that the team used a dumpster dive and surveillances to facilitate later penetrations of sensitive areas. Additionally, the team determined that playing a pizza delivery man could gain them access. Early in May of 2007, a group of homegrown radical Islamic terrorists were arrested after they had conducted detailed surveillances of some New Jersey area military installations. One of the techniques used to gain access and map the installation was to exploit the pizza delivery program.
This Red Team test gave the company the truth about the effectiveness of their security. It helped the company to identify vulnerabilities and thus devise measures to mitigate those vulnerabilities. In fact, the Red Team test is an excellent part of an overall risk assessment, which is fundamental to establishing an effective security program.
BSSG is an excellent choice. It is a neutral third party with considerable knowledge of the threats and modus operandi of the "bad guys." When BSSG has completed a test you will know whether or not your security is effective and if there are any gaps.
|
 |
Domestic Desk |
Colleges and Universities Deluged With Security Sales Pitches
In the wake of the shooting tragedy at Virginia Tech, the Denver Post reported that the University of Colorado, along with other colleges across the country, are being "deluged" with sales pitches from companies offering a full-range of security systems.
Contact with several other colleges and universities, and local school districts, revealed the same thing was happening to them.
Often it takes a tragic event such as the Virginia Tech incident, to drive home the point that security is important on a campus, whether it is a college, university, a high school or middle school, public or private school.
But, after an incident, what often happens, unfortunately, is that the boards, trustees or administrators who didn't pay attention to security, suddenly have a knee-jerk reaction and decide to throw some money at security measures. Many decide to invest in the latest technology that security vendors are trying to peddle. That means they deploy security officers and/or some specialized security equipment. You can predict what a particular security vendor will recommend because, no surprise, it will mirror the product/service that company sells. As the old adage goes: If you sell hammers, every problem looks like a nail
The assumption is that more guards or equipment will result in better security. This is often because the security providers -- the guard companies, the alarm companies and the closed circuit television companies -- have told the schools, colleges and universities that they need their equipment and services.
All too often, this approach results in ineffective security and wastes money because these security providers are only providing what is in their inventory and their current comfort zone. It is essential for the componenets that make up the solution to be fully integrated and complementary. The security measures should be risk-based. That means the security approach must provide at least four functions: deterrence, detection, delay and response. All of those functions must be present if security is to be truly effective. The best way to determine what security measures are appropriate is to conduct a thorough, professional third-party risk assessment and base decisions on security technology or approaches on the results of the risk assessment.
BSSG has conducted risk assessments and provided security consulting services for colleges, universities, public and private schools both within the United States and abroad. If the Virginia Tech shootings has caused you to consider more security, contact BSSG to discuss a comprehensive risk assessment and make certain you make wise decisions.
|
April 2007
This Month's Feature Article |
Asset Protection
What crime occurs every five seconds in the United States?
What crime results in the majority of insurance claims in the United States?
The answer to both of these questions is the same - burglary (which, in most jurisdictions, means someone illegally enters a residence or business and steals items of value).
What single security measure could potentially cut business and home burglaries by 50 percent?
Surprise. No, it is not a sophisticated alarm system with infrared motion detectors. It is not an intelligent IP-linked Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) System. It is not even an attack dog or a heavily armed security officer. All of these measures would probably have an impact on reducing burglaries, but what we are thinking of is something that costs far less.
There is one simple measure that will not necessarily cost a business or homeowner any more money, yet taking this security step can reduce burglaries by 50 percent and protect families from a significant number of assaults and robberies. All that business owners and their staff, or those living in houses, apartments or college dormitory rooms have to do to have a major impact on reducing crime is to -- lock their doors!
During the past two weeks, near our Florida office, there was an assault and robbery of an elderly woman in her trailer home, two young teen-aged girls were sexually assaulted in their homes and a six-year-old went into his room to find a drunk man passed out, lying on, and urinating on, his bed. In all of these cases the families had failed to lock a door in their home.
Several weeks ago a jury in Miami, Florida convicted John Couey of the sexual assault and murder of Jessica Lunsford, his 12-year-old neighbor girl, who lived in Homasassas, Florida. Couey has repeatedly stated he entered the house where Jessica was sleeping, through an unlocked door and abducted her. Couey has, subsequently, been sentenced to death for the crime.
There was an incredible amount of news generated as a result of this trial because the crime was so horrific and the victim was so young. And because Couey was a convicted sex offender. In spite of repeated attempts to get organizations like NBC and Fox News to use the publicity of the trial to also highlight a valuable security lesson from this tragedy, it was apparently not sensational enough. What BSSG was suggesting was to note that the best way to have potentially prevented this crime was for the family of Jessica Lunsford to have simply locked their door. BSSG is interested in saving lives and preventing crimes and everyone can take the step of locking their door and potentially prevent a crime.
Will simply locking the door prevent all crimes? Of course not. But that action could potentially prevent up to half of the crimes currently being committed. Having good quality locks, a latch guard and secure hinges are other important aspects of lock and door security that are important but all of that is undermined if no one uses the locking mechanism.
The author learned this repeatedly when in law enforcement. Once, the author had the opportunity to talk with a convicted serial rapist. When the rapist was asked about how he found his victims, the rapist said his modus operandi was simple. He walked through neighborhoods. The first thing he looked for, during his walk, was an open garage door. This, he said, was because, in his experience, the door between the garage and the rest of the house was almost never locked. If he could not find an open garage, he would then test the exterior doors of homes to see if the door was unlocked. Once again, he said he was surprised at how many unlocked exterior doors he found. If all of the exterior doors were locked, he might look for an open window but usually he said he just moved on because it was so easy to find an unlocked door further down the street.
He also noted that breaking through a locked door would mean he had to make a lot of noise and took time so he felt it was too risky.
In at least a dozen business burglaries and robberies the author has investigated, the intruder entered through an unlocked or propped open door. A year ago there was considerable publicity when an inmate overpowered a deputy, took her gun and rampaged through an Atlanta courthouse ultimately shooting a judge, court stenographer and attorney. The convict was able to walk unimpeded into the courtroom, through the judge's entrance, because the judge refused to follow requirements that he lock the door.
If you are looking at enhancing your security, be careful about using a security firm that already has an agenda. The results are amazingly predictable. If a security guard company does your assessment, the recommendations will always center around hiring guards. If an alarm company evaluates your home or business, the security recommendations will center around installing an alarm system. Find a company like BSSG that does not sell security equipment or guard services and bases its security recommendations on a good, unbiased risk assessment. For example, when determining countermeasures it is important to look at the threat from the eyes of the criminal and know their methods of operation. Sometimes the simplest and least expensive measures can be highly effective.
We are reminded of a U.S. scientist who told the author about his first sanctioned meeting with Russian space program counterparts, following the collapse of the Soviet Union. The U.S. scientist was excited and said he managed to find someone who had worked on some programs similar to what he had been working on. The U.S. scientist told one Russian counterpart that he had worked on the program to develop an ink pen that wrote in weightless conditions. He noted that he and his fellow U.S. scientists had spent thousands of hours and millions of dollars developing such an ink pen and now it was even available commercially. He asked his counterpart, "So how did you handle the problem of writing in weightless conditions?" The Russian scientist simply replied, "We just used a pencil."
Sometimes security consultants get so hung up on technology and gadgets that they miss the most basic and most cost-effective solutions. BSSG will evaluate all options and will be happy to recommend the "pencil option" if that is effective and can save you money! |
|
Incident Management Team Room |
Colorado Springs Makes Major Commitment to ICS
Since the beginning of this year, the City of Colorado Springs and several other nearby entities have undertaken a true "get serious approach" to using the Incident Command System (ICS). Colorado Springs is using ICS both within the city and within the region.
During the month of March alone, Colorado Springs, and neighboring jurisdictions, have sent more than 100 participants to a new advanced course on ICS Forms, Plans and Position Checklists. This workshop is not a mandated course with either grant penalties or overtime incentives from the Federal government, yet Colorado Springs saw the value of the training and made a commitment to get its people trained.
Participants have come from the Fire Department, Police Department, City Utilities, Code Enforcement, Dispatch and the Office of Emergency Management. The course, which has been approved by Colorado Peace Officers Standards and Training, is an all hazards approach to making the plans section function and produce a written Incident Action Plan. This is one of the most important features of ICS during large, expanding incidents. The workshop, created by Homeland Security Analysis and Consulting, has been extremely well received in southern Colorado and has also been put on for The U.S. Army's Fort Carson Colorado's Garrison Command, which is also located in Colorado Springs..
During April, the Colorado Springs Office of Emergency Management is hosting the two-day Command and General Type 3 workshop which was developed by Type 1 Incident Commander Marc Mullenix. Mr. Mullenix teams have been deployed to numerous wildfires and have an impressive all hazards track record that includes responding to 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, the shuttle crash recovery and, most recently, was called in to assist the State of Colorado during this winter's snow emergencies in the southeast corner of the State of Colorado.
|
|
The World of Industrial Espionage |
|
A study by the IT Policy Compliance Group came up with some interesting statistics. According to their study, which involved surveying a number of businesses of varying sizes and types, 68 percent of all companies lose valuable and sensitive data at least six times a year. No company avoided losses entirely and the 12 percent with the least losses still had lost sensitive data at least twice a year.
Depending on what that sensitive data was, its loss could have had a major impact on a, company's financial bottom line. One company this author has tried to help protect its sensitive information, had a court rule that the loss suffered in just one industrial espionage incident was valued at more than US$1 billion.
One medium-sized U.S. company said they had measured the value of their most sensitive trade secrets based on their competitive advantage and they determined their trade secerets were worth at least US$500 million a year to their bottom line. What that means is that even one or two losses could mean huge financial blow to a company. Six or more losses almost certainly translates into serious damage.
Clearly many companies have a ways to go in protecting their trade secrets and sensitive intellectual property. BSSG has considerable expertise in countering industrial espionage and protecting trade secrets. You can learn more about industrial espionage and other threats to business by attending the 2007 Business Continuity, Security & Crisis Management Seminars on May 22-23, 2007 at the InterContinental The Barclay in New York. Bruce Wimmer, of BSSG, will be the speaker on Countering Industrial Espionage & Cybercrime. |
 |
International Waters |
Upcoming Elections in the Philippines
Last month, the Analysis Brief covered the higher risk during the period leading up to the May 14 elections in the Philippines. In that article we talked about some things that have regularly occurred during the history of elections in the Philippines.
During the past month, a number of those predictions have come to pass.
The Philippine National Police (PNP) have asked the Commission on Elections to declare Masbate province (in Visayas region) as election "hot-spot" and one that warrants special security measures. Late last month a local mayoral candidate was ambushed in a convey with some of his supporters. The mayor was wounded but survived. Two of his supporters were killed in an attack. A PNP- Special Action Force was deployed in the area and the unit was attacked by members of the New People's Army (NPA). One PNP officer was killed and five others were wounded in the clash. The PNP have said that some of the politicians in Masbate province have agreed to pay the NPA to assassinate some of their political rivals.
The New People's Army is categorized as a terrorist group by the U.S. and Philippine governments. It is the militant arm of the Communist Party of the Philippines and has regularly smuggled and sold drugs, kidnapped for ransom and hired out its hit teams to corrupt politicians and business people to kill their rivals. The attack on the Masbate provincial candidate for mayor is typical of these attacks and warranted a stepped up response by the PNP but the PNP is frequently out-gunned by the well-armed NPA units. Masbate province is located off the Visayas sea, about 300 miles southeast of Manila.
Earlier, an armed assailant shot dead a congressional candidate as he drove in his car in Quezon City, in northern Metro Manila. An investigation by the PNP is underway but police believe the individual may well have been shot and killed by NPA members who were being paid by the congressional candidate's opponents.
As the election draws closer, there is good reason for the administration of President Gloria Arroyo to be concerned about the May 14 election results, especially in the Philippine Senate where Arroyo has barely managed to stave off impeachment actions last year. There are 12 senate seats open for this upcoming election. The most recent poll, just released, listed 13 top candidates for the 12 seats. There were 13 names because there was a virtual tie between the bottom two candidates. Of that total, seven candidates were from the Genuine Opposition Party/Estrada (GO-Erap) camp and are strongly opposed to the Arroyo administration and probably pro-impeachment; three more of the top candidates were affiliated with the Independent Party (IP) but also oppose Arroyo and favor her impeachment. There were only three from the pro-Arroyo Team Unit (TU) party, but even most of these TU candidates have been past opponents of the Arroyo administration.
The top 12 candidates during the just released poll were:
1. Loren Legarda - GO - opposed to the Arroyo administration
2. Manny Villar - GO - opposed to the Arroyo administration
3. Francisco Pangilinan - technically a GO candidate who has said he wants to run as an IP member but strongly favors impeachment
4. Pampilo Lacson - GO - opposed to the Arroyo administration
5. Chiz Escodero - GO - opposed to the Arroyo administration
6. Allan Cayetano - GO, a major opponent of Arroyo and strongly favors impeachment
7. Ralph Recto- TU, but was previously listed as an independent
8. Ed Angara - TU, running under the Arroyo ticket but someone who has opposed the Arroyo administration in the past
9. Gringo Honasan - IP - strongly against Arroyo administration and in jail for allegedly supporting a coup attempt
10. Joker Arroyo (no relation to the president) - IP - strongly opposed to the Arroyo administration
11. Benigno Aquino Jr. - GO - son of a previous president and opposed to Arroyo
12. (tie) Sergio Osmena - GO - opposed to the Arroyo administration
12. (tie) Tito Sotto -TU, running under the Arroyo ticket but someone who has opposed the Arroyo administration in the past
This poll demonstrates that the upcoming elections could be a problem for the Arroyo administration and it remains to be seen how the government will react. One thing is clear, now is the time for companies with staff in the Philippines or traveling to the Philippines to review their crisis management and emergency evacuation plans. It also is a further indication of the political instability that exists and makes the entire period up to the actual elections a higher risk for demonstrations, terrorism and increased criminal acts that are traditionally associated with politics and elections in the Philippines.
Additionally, many of the kidnappings and assassinations in the Philippines involve vehcile ambushes. Therefore BSSG is hosting an Escape and Evasive Driving course in the Metro Manila area to train drivers and those who drive their own vehicles in how to avoid problems and, in the worst case, how to survive an attack. The course is tentatively scheduled for June 1-2, 2007 at the Philippines National Police Camp Bagong Diwa in Taguig City. For more information on this training, contact any of our offices.
BSSG has experience and expertise in monitoring the threat and developing crisis management/emergency evacuation plans. If you have staff residing in, or traveling to the Philippines or other hot spots, contact BSSG to help you protect them. |
 |
Risk Assessment |
|
DHS Will Use Risk-Based Assessment of Chemical Facilities
The Department of Homeland Security has released what is termed an "interim final rule" for a new security program for high risk chemical facilities. Under the proposed rules, nearly half (up to 7000) of the 15,000 chemical plants in the United States would be required to complete an online questionnaire. The 400 plants deemed most vulnerable to terrorism would be required to enhance their security plans.
The new proposed rules do not require chemical plants to use chemicals that are less volatile or inherently safer, as some in Congress has asked. Nor do the rules set a deadline for changes, however, the plants will ultimately be inspected and audited. If the plants have not improved their security they could be fined up to $25,000 a day. The new rules also will not supercede states which want to impose more stringent security and safety regulations. The chemical industry had been hoping for standarized national requirements that would supercede some states which have imposed special security requirements on plants using hazardous chemicals. While standardized rules would be better, if not all chemical plants will be inspected and held to the standard you cannot blame states that want to protect their citizens when Homeland Security and the EPA will not.
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said it was important the have a comprehensive and full idea of what the chemical-based risks were. He said that the new guidelines would use a risk-based approach and would place the most emphasis on facilities that had the highest potential consequences.
AL QAEDA USES MORE CHLORINE GAS BOMBS
As a follow-up to last months Analysis Brief, some 20 people were killed, another 30 seriously injured and more than 50 were treated for difficulty in breathing in Ramadi on April 6, 2007, when a suicide bomber detonated a bomb on a truck that contained a combination of conventional explosives and chlorine gas in cylinders. This particular truck was allegedly headed for a police checkpoint when police thought the truck was trying to accelerate and ram the checkpoint. They opened fire and the truck swerved into a nearby residential complex and exploded. According to authorities this was the sixth use of chlorine gas in Anbar province alone in the past two months and it is being used by al Qaeda to target groups which have been turning against al Qaeda within Iraq. A large number of the victims were elderly, women and children. The fact that al Qaeda is increasingly using chlorine gas and targets include elderly, women and children in residential areas should drive home the importance of protecting chlorine gas and other potentially dangerous chemicals even in the United States.
BSSG has specialized expertise in conducting chemical risk assessments and a risk-based assessment is the best way to determine which enhancements will do the most to reduce the risk to the public.
|
 |
Red Team Concept |
Whether you are conducting a risk assessment or doing an OPSEC (operational security) survey, it is important to truly think like the "bad guys" in the process.
Too often, in government and in the private sector, people make decisions based on what they think. The most frequently heard comment in the security business may well be: "I don't think anyone would do that." Our question in those circumstances is always - "Why do you think that way? What is the basis and analysis that went into your conculsion?" Usually the ensuing conversation establishes there was no valid basis for believing that way.
A better approach is to try and look at a situation from the eyes of those posing the threat. This requires research and analysis, experience and expertise.
If you think your security is good, consider testing its effectiveness by using a "red team" concept.
This is a concept where experts, called a "red team," will strive to think and act like those who pose the threats. You may learn a lot about the effectiveness of your security approach by employing a red team because you get as close to a real-world test as possible without the serious consequences.
For example, not too long ago, a food manufacturing company hired a security consulting firm to test their access control by trying to get around their access control system. The "red team" members determined that all the staff working at the facility wore white laboratory coats with the company logo. They went to a local uniform store, bought a white laboratory coat and carried a clipboard where the logo would be. No surprise. They were able to walk right past security and tailgate their way into the manufacturing area. They were able to take pictures of the manufacturing process, even remove some samples and were never challenged. Company security was embarrassed by the penetration but did learn they had some vulnerabilities.
Just a little earlier in the year, the same security consulting firm was hired to try and penetrate a major food distribution center. The three-person red team found a low spot under the fence and was able to crawl into the compound. The team entered numerous warehouses and walked around unchallenged. Since the team had worn dark clothing, including stocking caps, there was a concern that someone might turn them in. Having seen everything they wanted to see, the team decided to leave about midnight. As the team walked out the gate, past the manned security post, a lone officer called out, "Hey...just a minute, we had some reports of three strange guys wondering around our facilities." One of the team members called back, "We haven't seen them and we are just headed out for midnight chow." The security officer retreated inside the guard shack saying, "Oh okay. Have a good break." Once again, the company learned a great deal about how secure their distribution center really was.
BSSG employs the red team to help companies test their security and verify security compliance. If you truly want to know how good your security is, consider using the red team concept and contact us at BSSG.
|
March 2007
|
This Month's Feature Article
|
RED TEAM COUNTERSURVEILLANCES
Recently a renowned burglar and jewel thief was apprehended by authorities in Florida. What was interesting to us was his largely successful modus operandi. As is often the case, when you understand the methods used by the bad guys, you can devise truly effective countermeasures.
This particular thief specialized in breaking into homes of affluent individuals to steal high value jewels and other valuables. Most of these homes were "protected" by intrusion detection systems (alarms) and jewels/valuables were often kept in safes.
What made this thief so successful were two aspects of his modus operandi: (1) How he selected his targets and (2) how he circumvented detection and delay mechanisms.
This thief used a technique successfully employed by some armed robbers who followed individuals home from banks - he went to top-of-the-line jewelry stores and surveilled the business, recording the vehicle descriptions and license numbers of patrons who appeared to be purchasing high quality, expensive jewelry. He was then able to determine the home addresses of his potential targets.
In phase 2 of his operations, he looked for the alarm company sign and decals on doors/windows. He knew which alarm companies used which systems and he knew the weaknesses of each company and their technicians. For example, he knew which technicians were lazy and just used the standard default settings during installation. He used pretexting to double check and even obtain additional information on the safes used. Armed with this information he was able to find targets that offered the best chance he could successfully break-in, steal and get away.
There are at least two lessons learned here.
First, high class jewelry stores allowed themselves to be used by providing no counter surveillance of their premises. As a result of focusing only on the inner perimeter of their facilities, thieves were free to stakeout their customers just outside their entrances. Businesses that deal in high value items such as jewelry and collectibles, or banks, should be pro-active and use counter surveillance to protect both themselves and their clients. BSSG provides "red team" counter surveillance units which are trained in spotting criminal surveillance, analyzing the information and devising countermeasures.
Second, most homeowners were unable to properly evaluate alarm systems, companies and safes. BSSG does not sell equipment and will no accept commissions. Hence, BSSG can conduct unbiased risk assessments. We know which intrusion detection systems and safes, and which companies provide the best related services. |
|
Incident Management Team Room |
Homeland Security Analysis and Consulting Opens Arapahoe County Based Training Room
The Democratic National Convention is scheduled to be held in Denver, Colorado in the fall of 2008. Homeland Security Analysis and Consulting (HSAC), based in the Denver suburb of Aurora, Colorado has entered into an agreement with JDS Tactical , Inc. to utilize their high tech training and simulation room to help companies and government entities to prepare for dealing with emergencies that can go with such a high profile event. The capabilities of this training room allow workshop participants to function in small teams and work through a number of scenarios based on 15 national planning scenarios as well as other tailored inputs. The training room allows interactive participation that is electronically controlled and incident management outcomes are driven by the decisions made by the teams. All of this data is run through a computer program and prompts are done through a Microsoft PowerPoint display that allows the entire class to see what is transpiring by projecting it on a giant.
HSAC will incorporate a number of factors into the training sessions that will be conducted at the facility. This includes: Consequence Management, the usage and understanding of Incident Command System (ICS), understanding the ICS forms and producing Incident Action Plans, Threat and Vulnerability Assessment modeling, the relationship between ICS and the Emergency Operations Center as well as how to use the various Incident Management Programs such as CAMEO and I-Suite.
All training conducted at the facility is 100 percent National Incident Management System (NIMS) and HSEEP compliant.
The first course - Incident Command System Forms, Plans and Position Checklists - will be conducted on April 13, 2007. This custom designed course is based on, and builds on, the concepts of NIMS and the new all-hazard curriculum. The instructors will be Colorado's most active group of Lead ICS / 449 qualified instructors during calendar year 2006.
Additionally, this first course has been approved by Colorado Peace Officers Standards and Training pursuant to P.O.S.T. course number HS0010 and is pending POST approval in 10 other states. For more information on the upcoming training opportunities contact Homeland Security Analysis and Consulting at 303-680-3274. |
|
The World of Industrial Espionage |
INDUSTRIAL ESPIONAGE IN INDIA
The following information was recently published in India and, as a result, some extremely interesting insights emerged about industrial espionage in India:
The article noted the arrest of a Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited employee for allegedly leaking information to a competing company is one of the few cases of industrial espionage that have come to light within India.
"Only 20 per cent of corporate espionage cases are detected. Of this, a mere 20 per cent get reported and only 10 per cent can be solved," says Raghu Raman, CEO, Mahindra Special Services Group, in India.
To date there have been very few convictions in India for industrial espionage or data theft, and not a single case has been registered under Section 66 of the IT Act 2000 -- a recent online ticket booking fraud case, where airlines were duped, is a case in point.
"In data theft cases, proving the crime is difficult. Besides, it could span across countries, under different jurisdictions, making it more difficult for law enforcement agencies," explains Vijay Mukhi, president, Foundation of Information Security and Technology in India. "Every company I meet knows they are victim of some or the other form of data theft, but are not aware of how to deal with it," he adds.
"Any corporate leveraging intellectual property rights, offering cost-effective solutions or innovative or ingenuous solutions and not taking structured measures to protect its IPR, loses 5-10 per cent of their revenues to data theft," corroborates Raman.
In India, industrial espionage (online or offline) is defined as any activity that a company carries out to obtain information about its current, potential or future competitors through illegal, unethical or immoral means. The problem is that even in the most digitalized of companies, over 70 per cent of information is still in non-digital forms.
Companies that invest heavily in firewalls and other protection measures forget that over 15 per cent of their employees are talking to headhunters and prospective new employers at that very moment, according to experts.
"We get at least one or two cases every month, besides many inquiries; our clients ask us for specific information from their competitors or send dummy interviewees to find out salary packages," says Sunil Sharma, CEO, Authentic Investigation, in New Delhi.
Ajay Jugran, Partner of Indian law firm, Lawcombine, says, "This malady is deep-rooted. It's prevalent when Public Sector Undertakings call for bids. Trading in bidding information is rampant."
"Companies are even using annual maintenance contractors to plant surveillance software in rival firms. The software gives a daily log of the data via e-mail. Corporations have not awoken to this fact despite the fact that the law (unless for national security purposes) does not permit this," explains cyber law expert and Indian Supreme Court lawyer Pavan Duggal.
Companies the world over are known to hire teams to both plant and detect eavesdropping devices. Sachit Kumar, Director of New Delhi-based Globe Detective Agency, says: "We help clients by sending undercover agents (into competitor companies). The rate of success is 95 per cent in most cases." The charges for these moles could range anywhere between Rs 30,000-75,000 per month.
Companies that have sensitive information (trade secrets, personal information, etc.) should understand the risks in India. It is worth reiterating that there has not been a conviction in India for industrial espionage. While there has been a big "hoopla" in the U.S. about the use of pretexting (note last month's Brief article on the Hewlett-Packard incident) private investigations companies in India regularly use the technique to gather information.
What was perhaps even more interesting than the facts and figures presented in the article was the feedback on the article that came from within India. Reader after reader noted the techniques described as "spying" were regularly practiced in India. Readers noted this was just business as usual in India and that such techniques were sanctioned by top management in Indian businesses.
If you are doing business in India, it is important to understand the industrial espionage threat there. BSSG specializes in tailored, risk-based programs to counter industrial espionage in a global business environment. Contact us to learn how we can help you deal with this threat.
|
 |
International Waters |
|
PHILIPPINE ELECTION THREATS
The Philippines will hold elections for national legislators, provincial offices such as governors, and local offices such as mayors, on May 14, 2007.
There have already been at least half a dozen attacks on politicians running for office. Recently several politicians who are in opposition to the ruling administration of President Gloria Arroyo have revealed they were aware of plans to conduct bombing attacks during political campaign speeches and rallies.
The Philippines has a history of using violence and assassinations to shape elections. Criminal groups and terrorists use the elections to extort money from politicians. The Philippine National Police has stepped up protective measures but the breadth of elections means the task is daunting. Additionally, the police have put so many resources into protecting the election process that criminals are finding more freedom to conduct robberies, hold-ups and other crimes. Companies with personnel stationed in the Philippines, or visiting the Philippines, should encourage them to be extra vigilant during the election period.
Note that BSSG has an office in the Philippines and carefully tracks threats and trends there. One thing is clear. Travelers and visitors should be aware of the upcoming elections and should avoid rallies, demonstrations and political activities through mid-May. |
 |
Risk Assessment |
|
CHEMICAL CORNER
During the past several weeks terrorist groups in Iraq have begun employing chlorine gas in their attacks. They have used two techniques.
One involved hijacking a chlorine tank truck and placing explosives on the trailer and then detonating them near the target, resulting in the release of a cloud of deadly chlorine gas from the damaged tanker.
Another technique involved the theft of chlorine gas stored in cylinders used for things such as water purification. These cylinders can fit into smaller vehicles and, once again, the technique was to drive a vehicle containing the cylinders near the target, detonate a vehicular borne improvised explosive device to release the deadly chlorine chemical.
At least a dozen Iraqis were reportedly killed in the two incidents and dozens more were sickened by inhaling the gas released by these attacks. The psychological effects may have been even more devastating than conventional explosives.
Homeland Security experts have long worried about the potential for using chemicals, such as chlorine, that would be dispersed after a conventional explosion. Documents and interactive DVDs found in safe houses in Iraq make it clear that terrorists have transitioned from theory to practice and it makes security of potentially dangerous chemicals, such as chlorine gas, an even more urgent priority.
BSSG has specialized expertise in conducting chemical risk assessments and providing truly effective countermeasures to protect chemicals from a variety of threats. |
|
Asset Protection |
|
Today there are dozens, if not hundreds, of security related products available on the market. This month we are going to analyze some of the methods used to protect hard assets such as personal property, tools, vehicles, and other various types of equipment.
Did you know that in the entire U.S. only two percent of stolen property is returned? The reason is that, all too often, police have no way of proving the property they have recovered is actually stolen and who it might really belong to.
So, how can we improve the recovery rates for stolen property?
One of the most obvious ways is to mark property and equipment. Some businesses do that with some sort of property control program that includes recording serial numbers and nomenclature and often includes a property control label. However, marking is not as simple as it sounds. Not any marking will do. If the marking method uses something that can easily be spotted -- like a property control label -- the thieves will remove or obliterate the marking or serial number and thus render it worthless. If the marking is covert, so the thieves cannot easily remove or obliterate it, then you have to wonder if the police will spot it...and if they do, the issue then becomes how they will link that marking back to the owner. Normally this means and education and awareness program for police departments. Since thieves do not just operate within a single police jurisdiction and stolen property often does not remain in the area where it was stolen for long, this education program has to be nationwide. It also means an appropriate and properly maintained database and probably a good web site and/or toll free number.
The key is to mark parts and elements so the police, if they recover anything, can identify it as: (a) stolen (that requires identifying the legal owner) -- so the thieves can be prosecuted, and (b) the police can then return it to the legal owner (recovery).
According to Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) yearly crime reports, in the past two years, state-wide motor vehicle theft losses totaled $965,413,556. The total recovered was $569,421,566. That means there is $395,991,990 of unrecovered, stolen vehicle related property out there in Florida alone.
What are the methods used to try and protect business or personal assets?
Alarm
An alarm system provides a detection method that notifies there has been an unauthorized entry. But the effectiveness of an alarm system is limited by need for a response (if no one hears the alarm, no signal is received or no one pays attention to it...there is no response) and there must be enough delay time to allow someone to respond and get to the vehicle or premises before the thief leaves.
Transponder
Limited by the need for detection; if the owner/police do not know the items have been stolen, there may not be time to activate the transponder before the transponder can be separated from other items or from components.
Branding
It can be obliterated also it needs to be done in multiple locations in order for it to be effective, and then the questions is: are police nation-wide trained to identify the brand and trace it.
Micro Chips
Police are usually not trained to scan for them. The methodology and cost can be an issue for both police and the user and limit the number of microchips that are needed for effective and complete coverage of all components.
Locks
Locks can slow down a thief. But locks are only a delay mechanism. Given enough time a thief can break through most locks or bypass them. You also need detection and response. Delay alone is ineffective. Detection could be provided by an alarm system but you still need a response capability. The benefit of the lock is that it may delay a thief long enough and they might give up. But, if it becomes apparent there is no response, a lock alone will not prevent a determined thief.
Stamping or Labeling
Stamps and labels can be obliterated or covered and police are not trained to look for them.
The trick to marking is that it needs to be done in multiple locations and done in a way that it can not be spotted by a thief but can be found and understood by police nation-wide. It is also important to understand the limitations of relying on a single approach and use a multi-layered approach to protect your assets. Having a alarm alone may not be enough. Having a transponder alone may not be enough. Having both is better but it still may not be enough. There is no single magic bullet to prevent theft, but there are several things you can do to enhance protection for your assets.
The only way to protect your self and your assets is having a holistic approach, understand current systems and their limitations, and use multiple, overlapping systems to fill the gaps identified in a comprehensive risk assessment. Don't assume that your current systems are adequate. Technology changes and as soon as a new system enters the market, the bad guys/gals are already trying to figure out how to defeat it.
Some businesses and people say accepting loss as the "price for doing business." That is not true and eventually that attitude will cost you big. If you are lucky enough to have small losses, over time they become "real money" too. Losses can be prevented most of the time and when prevention fails, you still have a chance to recover the stolen property. But, that is only the case if you have planned accordingly. BSSG can help you evaluate systems and design a protection approach that is reasonably priced and truly effective. |
Sign up for the Homeland Security Toolbox Analysis Brief
|